theory-frankfurt-school
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Reich & the Frankfurt School
- Subject: Re: Reich & the Frankfurt School
- From: James Rovira <jrovira@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 11:30:15 -0400
That's a good question -- the quotation seems exactly backwards. I
remember Martin Jay describing a falling out between Fromm and H and A
in _The Dialectical Imagination_, but I don't remember the details
offhand. It could be that a "smooth" transition between individual
psychology and social theory would undermine any possible dialectical
relationship between the two. A tension needs to be maintained, rather
than seeing one collapsed into the other.
Jim
Ralph Dumain wrote:
> Wiggershaus has only a few references on Wilhelm Reich, mostly in
> connection with Fromm, who incorporated the concept of character
> structure into his social psychology. There is one curious reference
> to Adorno, though (p. 159). Adorno was working on some project (some
> time between 1933 and 1935, it seems): Wiggerstrauss says Adorno
> "would begin with Reich, because Reich, unlike Fromm, maintained that
> individual psychology could not be smoothly transferred to social
> theory." What's this all about?
>
>
- Thread context:
- Re: Jameson, (continued)
- Reich & the Frankfurt School,
Ralph Dumain Thu 17 Apr 2003, 15:08 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Reich & the Frankfurt School,
j laari Thu 17 Apr 2003, 15:24 GMT
- Re: Reich & the Frankfurt School,
James Rovira Thu 17 Apr 2003, 15:30 GMT
- Re: Reich & the Frankfurt School,
Neil McLaughlin Thu 17 Apr 2003, 17:17 GMT
- Re: Reich & the Frankfurt School,
James Rovira Thu 17 Apr 2003, 18:13 GMT
- Re: Reich & the Frankfurt School,
James Rovira Thu 17 Apr 2003, 18:46 GMT
- Re: Reich & the Frankfurt School,
Neil McLaughlin Thu 17 Apr 2003, 20:46 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]