theory-frankfurt-school
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Reich & the Frankfurt School
- Subject: Re: Reich & the Frankfurt School
- From: j laari <jlaari@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 18:24:43 +0300 (EEST)
Ciao
Could the reason for the statement have anything to do with this:
perhaps Reich had certain reasons not to collapse (or reduce) the
individual into the social, or vice versa? Ie. perhaps he saw real
contradictions between the social and the individual. Surely Adorno
wanted to maintain the difference and contradiction between them.
Versus Fromm, Mr. Anti-Dialectics.
Sincerely, Jukka L
PS. Still haven't answered to your earlier answers... However, there
are few lazier days to come.
> : Wiggerstrauss says Adorno "would begin with
> Reich, because Reich, unlike Fromm, maintained that individual psychology
> could not be smoothly transferred to social theory." What's this all about?
- Thread context:
- Re: Jameson, (continued)
- Reich & the Frankfurt School,
Ralph Dumain Thu 17 Apr 2003, 15:08 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Reich & the Frankfurt School,
j laari Thu 17 Apr 2003, 15:24 GMT
- Re: Reich & the Frankfurt School,
James Rovira Thu 17 Apr 2003, 15:30 GMT
- Re: Reich & the Frankfurt School,
Neil McLaughlin Thu 17 Apr 2003, 17:17 GMT
- Re: Reich & the Frankfurt School,
James Rovira Thu 17 Apr 2003, 18:13 GMT
- Re: Reich & the Frankfurt School,
James Rovira Thu 17 Apr 2003, 18:46 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]