theory-frankfurt-school
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
SV: Habermas Q
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
------ =_NextPart_001_01BE017E.7A128B30
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Worth mentioning, I think, is also Maeve Cookes dissertation on =
Habermas
integration of a speech act theory of meaning: Language and reason =
(MIT
Press).
Regards
Christian
----------
Fr=E5n: Rainbow Bookstore Cooperative[SMTP:rbc@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Skickat: den 27 oktober 1998 04:34
Till: frankfurt-school@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Ang=E5ende: Re: Habermas Q
did this get answered? I don't have the texts in front of me,
but if memory
serves the phrase pops up in H's discussion of Dialectic of
Enlightenment
in both Theory of Communicative Action (end of vol 1) and Phil
Discourse of
Modernity (chapter on Horkheimer & Adorno). Martin Jay wrote a
whole
article on the topic as well. Also there are several excellent
counter-critiques of Habermas' use of this concept, if you read
German.
Peter
----------
> From: Jennifer McCarroll <jennifermccarroll@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: frankfurt-school@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Habermas Q
> Date: Thursday, October 22, 1998 5:23 AM
>=20
> Question: Does anyone know a reference for Habermas' term
"performative
> contradiction" ?
>=20
>=20
=09
------ =_NextPart_001_01BE017E.7A128B30
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
5.5.1960.3">
<TITLE>SV: Habermas Q</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<P><FONT FACE=3D"Arial">Worth mentioning, I think, is also Maeve Cookes =
dissertation on Habermas integration of a speech act theory of =
meaning: <I> Language and reason</I> (MIT Press).</FONT></P>
<P><FONT FACE=3D"Arial">Regards</FONT>
<BR><FONT FACE=3D"Arial">Christian</FONT>
</P>
<BR>
<UL>
<P><A NAME=3D"_MailData"><FONT SIZE=3D1 FACE=3D"MS Sans =
Serif">----------</FONT></A>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D1 FACE=3D"MS Sans Serif">Fr=E5n: Rainbow =
Bookstore Cooperative[SMTP:rbc@xxxxxxxxxxxx]</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D1 FACE=3D"MS Sans Serif">Skickat: den 27 =
oktober 1998 04:34</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D1 FACE=3D"MS Sans Serif">Till: =
frankfurt-school@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D1 FACE=3D"MS Sans Serif">Ang=E5ende: Re: =
Habermas Q</FONT><B></B><B></B>
</P>
<P><FONT COLOR=3D"#000000" FACE=3D"Arial">did this get answered? I =
don't have the texts in front of me, but if memory</FONT>
<BR><FONT COLOR=3D"#000000" FACE=3D"Arial">serves the phrase pops up in =
H's discussion of Dialectic of Enlightenment</FONT>
<BR><FONT COLOR=3D"#000000" FACE=3D"Arial">in both Theory of =
Communicative Action (end of vol 1) and Phil Discourse of</FONT>
<BR><FONT COLOR=3D"#000000" FACE=3D"Arial">Modernity (chapter on =
Horkheimer & Adorno). Martin Jay wrote a whole</FONT>
<BR><FONT COLOR=3D"#000000" FACE=3D"Arial">article on the topic as =
well. Also there are several excellent</FONT>
<BR><FONT COLOR=3D"#000000" FACE=3D"Arial">counter-critiques of =
Habermas' use of this concept, if you read German.</FONT>
<BR> <FONT COLOR=3D"#000000" =
FACE=3D"Arial">Peter</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT COLOR=3D"#000000" FACE=3D"Arial">----------</FONT>
<BR><FONT COLOR=3D"#000000" FACE=3D"Arial">> From: Jennifer =
McCarroll <jennifermccarroll@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx></FONT>
<BR><FONT COLOR=3D"#000000" FACE=3D"Arial">> To: =
frankfurt-school@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</FONT>
<BR><FONT COLOR=3D"#000000" FACE=3D"Arial">> Subject: Habermas =
Q</FONT>
<BR><FONT COLOR=3D"#000000" FACE=3D"Arial">> Date: Thursday, October =
22, 1998 5:23 AM</FONT>
<BR><FONT COLOR=3D"#000000" FACE=3D"Arial">> </FONT>
<BR><FONT COLOR=3D"#000000" FACE=3D"Arial">> Question: Does anyone =
know a reference for Habermas' term "performative</FONT>
<BR><FONT COLOR=3D"#000000" FACE=3D"Arial">> contradiction" =
?</FONT>
<BR><FONT COLOR=3D"#000000" FACE=3D"Arial">> </FONT>
<BR><FONT COLOR=3D"#000000" FACE=3D"Arial">> </FONT>
<BR>
</P>
</UL>
</BODY>
</HTML>
------ =_NextPart_001_01BE017E.7A128B30--
- Thread context:
- Re: repressive desublimation, (continued)
- Habermas Q,
Jennifer McCarroll Thu 22 Oct 1998, 13:23 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Habermas Q,
Rainbow Bookstore Cooperative Tue 27 Oct 1998, 03:33 GMT
- SV: Habermas Q,
Christian Nilsson Tue 27 Oct 1998, 07:50 GMT
- FS in US,
Russell Jacoby Tue 20 Oct 1998, 05:36 GMT
- postone,
rc&am Mon 19 Oct 1998, 15:10 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: postone,
ken Mon 19 Oct 1998, 23:58 GMT
- Re: postone,
rc&am Tue 20 Oct 1998, 15:49 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]