|
Yesterday, Geoffrey Gardiner posted the following to
Gang8:
[....] I have come to the following
conclusions.
1. There are basically two kinds of money, money derived
from businessmens' debts, "strong money," and money derived from state debts
"weak money.".
2. Strong money is driven by assets and by
interest.
3. Weak money [as in the mediaeval term: monnaie faible -
insert] is driven by taxes and by interest on government bonds.
4. The growth of the use of weak money is a very recent
development in the four thousand+ year history of money.
This analysis fits the empirical facts.
Weak money can be interest free only up to the limit that
the public and the banks need it for liquidity. Any surplus which remains in
circulation because taxes are not high enough, must be mopped up by government
bond issues. Government attempts to force banks to hold more weak money than
they require will always be difficult to enforce, and serve no useful purpose.
FYI.
Gunnar
|
- Re: US Trade Deficit As 'World Engine Of Growth'?, (continued)
- Re: US Trade Deficit As 'World Engine Of Growth'?, William B. Ryan Tue 30 Sep 2003, 16:02 GMT
- Re: US Trade Deficit As 'World Engine Of Growth'?, Gunnar Tómasson Tue 30 Sep 2003, 17:09 GMT
- Re: US Trade Deficit As 'World Engine Of Growth'?, pdavidso Tue 30 Sep 2003, 21:57 GMT
- Money, Socialism, Outcomes -- Chartalism Debate, John Gelles Wed 24 Sep 2003, 15:32 GMT
- Fw: [gang8] Cartalism, Gunnar Tómasson Tue 23 Sep 2003, 23:24 GMT
- Re: Fw: [gang8] Cartalism, James R. Olson, jr. Wed 24 Sep 2003, 03:42 GMT
- Re: Fw: [gang8] Cartalism, Gunnar Tómasson Wed 24 Sep 2003, 15:38 GMT
- Re: Fw: [gang8] Cartalism, James R. Olson, jr. Thu 25 Sep 2003, 20:10 GMT
- Re: Fw: [gang8] Cartalism, Gunnar Tómasson Thu 25 Sep 2003, 20:08 GMT