PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Putting Chartalism In Its Place?
- To: post keynesian thought <pkt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Putting Chartalism In Its Place?
- From: Harry Veeder <eo200@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 00:33:48 +0100
- User-agent: Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.0.3
James R. Olson wrote:
> You do not need to pay taxes to value a currency, you merely need some
> access, even if it is indirect, to people who do pay taxes and will value
> the currency for that reason.
>
> Can you name a currency which is not used to pay taxes, and yet retains
> value?
No, but it does not follow that the value of a national currency chosen at
random is necessarily due to the power of that nation's government to tax.
IMO, taxation may help to start a currency, but once it is regularly
exchanged with other currencies it becomes self-sustaining.
Like training wheels on a bicycle, I suspect taxation eventually becomes
irrelevant to the value of a stable currency.
Harry Veeder
- Thread context:
- Re: Putting Chartalism In Its Place?, (continued)
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]