PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Constructive Saving
- To: post keynesian thought <pkt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Constructive Saving
- From: Harry Veeder <eo200@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 16:38:35 +0100
- User-agent: Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.0.3
Saving is usually defined to be S = Y - C.
And income Y = C + I, so S = I
This notion of saving involves the tacit assumption that saving does not
(and cannot) independently affect Y. However, suppose for the moment, we
leave saving as an undefined variable S* so that saving and investment both
affect Y independently:
1) Y = I + S*
Now define saving as spending less investment:
2) S* = C - I
This implies:
Y = I + (C - I)
3) Y = C
In this system of definitions, investment is the price of all goods
and services. Saving is constructive when S* > 0, or when C > I and it is
unconstructive when S* < 0, or when C < I.
When investment exceeds spending, saving becomes unconstructive, and
investment should be taxed. When spending exceeds investment, saving
is constructive and investment should not be taxed.
Harry Veeder
- Thread context:
- Budgetary policies,
Forstater, Mathew Sat 13 Sep 2003, 15:04 GMT
- heterodox conference announcements,
Lee, Frederic Fri 12 Sep 2003, 14:44 GMT
- Constructive savings,
pdavidso Thu 11 Sep 2003, 22:30 GMT
- Constructive Saving,
Harry Veeder Thu 11 Sep 2003, 21:20 GMT
- Re: on Stiglitz - "idle reserves" etc.,
Gunnar Tómasson Thu 11 Sep 2003, 16:50 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]