PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Natural Resource Curse and Citizen Revenue Distribution Funds
An interesting proposal. Should be appealing to post(-)Keynesians.
The proposal is presented not only as an alternative to the model of
top-heavy, corrupt, government-owned oil industry, but also as an
alternative to the model of "privatization" (throwing oil production and
distribution to the wolves of the multinational oil industry).
Gernot Köhler, Ph.D.
(Canada and Germany, presently writing from quaint old university town of
Tuebingen in Germany)
In response to:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Natural Resource Curse and Citizen Revenue Distribution Funds
by Thomas I. Palley 23 July 2003
Dear Colleagues,
Please find attached a discussion paper "Combating the Natural
Resource Curse with Citizen Revenue Distribution Funds: Oil and the Case of
Iraq."
Such funds can contribute to lasting economic and political
transformation. However, it is critical that any decision to create a fund
be taken by the Iraqi people, through legitimate democratic
institutions.Only this can ensure lasting political legitimacy.
I hope you find the paper of interest.
Sincerely,
Tom Palley
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
quote from the paper:
DISCUSSION PAPER
Combating the Natural Resource Curse with Citizen Revenue Distribution
Funds: Oil and the Case of Iraq
Executive Summary
Iraq provides another example of the natural resource curse, whereby natural
resource revenues cause economic stagnation and detrimental political
outcomes, rather than growth and development. This paper examines the idea
of an oil revenue distribution fund (ORDF) that would directly distribute
part of Iraq's oil revenues to Iraqis. Such a fund can unleash positive
lasting economic and political transformation. However, it is critical that
the decision about creating a fund be made by the Iraqi people, through
legitimate democratic institutions. Only this can ensure lasting political
legitimacy.
On the economic side, an ORDF can empower citizens to lead economic growth.
Oil rich countries frequently suffer from economic activity skewed toward
excessive government, which also promotes corruption and conflict. An ORDF
can help rectify this. On the political side, it will give ownership to
citizens, thereby creating an incentive for political engagement to protect
that ownership. . . .
[end quote]
- Thread context:
- Re: Fw: Keynesian, Edisonian, Fordian, Gellesian Money,
William F Hummel Fri 25 Jul 2003, 14:50 GMT
- Re: Affordable Consumer Price. Affordable National Programs,
William F Hummel Thu 24 Jul 2003, 15:29 GMT
- Natural Resource Curse and Citizen Revenue Distribution Funds,
Thomas I. Palley Wed 23 Jul 2003, 19:31 GMT
- more things of interest,
Lee, Frederic Wed 23 Jul 2003, 19:29 GMT
- Post Doctoral Opportunity for heterodox modeller in Australia,
Bill Mitchell Wed 23 Jul 2003, 19:07 GMT
- Re: Re. Is money a credit or a debt?,
John Gelles Wed 23 Jul 2003, 19:05 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]