Re: Growth vs Prosperity

[John Vertegaal <vertegaa@xxxxxxxxx>]

Bill Ryan asks in reponse the below:

> -->You want to remunerate housewives? no problem.
> Sure, taxes will need to be raised.<--

> Why?

Re. the first sentence: It was the most far-reaching example I could
think of to broaden the economy in an integrated way, on short notice.

Re. its entirety:  The means of remuneration (i.e. its logical value)
follows from (previously stated) basic axioms; and therefore rules out
transitional tinkering with those means.

I am familiar with your SC paradigm Bill.  And though there is a bit of
logic to it; unless this can be shown to follow from a set of (equally
valid) stated axioms, I hold that its adherents are just money cranks.
Sorry to be so blunt.

John V