PKT
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

Re: Central Banks and Deflation



At 12:28 PM 5/22/03 , you wrote:
The Federal Reserve is very nervous about deflation.  The reason for this
is more than its awarenes of the grave danger of deflation on the
economy.  The real reason is is that central banks in general, and the Fed
in particular, do not have the power or operative measures within their
discourse to deal with deflation. The exclusive dependence of central
banks on interest rate policy to fight inflation does not work for
fighting deflation, as a decade of data in Japan has shown. The Fed is now
following Japan's lead in trying to manage an exchange rate policy
(talking is not pushing the dollar down) to export deflation to its
trading partners.


This is a result of the 1970s Monetarist triumphant claim (and the American
Neoclassical Keynesian failure to refute)  that monetary policy was the
only game in town -- and that fiscal policy was futile!  Why was this
so?  Because both monetarists and Old and New Keynesians accept the
neutrality of money axiom as relevant -- at least in the long run.
Consequently the Od --and later the New Keynesians logical theory could
only explain unemployment as due to sticky wages and prices. Once enough
unemployment of sufficient duration was experienced, Monetarists such as
Milton Friedman in essence argued, wages would fall ( -- or at least rise
by no more than productivity gains) , therefore inflation would be
conquered and Sy's Law would return as the CB lowered interest rates to an
amount equal to the marginal productivity of capital at full
employment.  Say's Law would be established and the central banker would be
made a Saint by the

The Chinese economy has been accused by some Japanese economists as
exporting deflation by stripping non-Chinese companies of their pricing
power. That is an obvious fact, but the cause of this does not origninal
from inside China.  As I pointed out in an earlier post (Dollar's slide
and PPP), the Chinese currency, the RMB, is actually depreciating against
the dollar on a PPP adjusted basis, despite a nominal peg.  Thus with the
US pushing the dollar down, it will only exacerbate China's deflation export.

The problem is not the relative value of the dollar, but the dollar's role
as the dominant reserve currency for trade.  The use of exchange rates to
manage trade is a destructive move, regardless who does it. Exchange rates
need to be stable and to change only gradually and infrequently.  Trade
needs to be structured to increase domestic wages rather than to push
domestic wages down.  Pushing wages down decreases purchaing power
domestically which directly contracts international trade.

Central banks must change their theology of protector of the value of
money and start promoting full employment and rising wages worldwide and
alter an economic system that rewards corporate policies of layoffs and
cost cutting, to one that rewards job creation and expansion.


Henry C.K. Liu

Louise Davidson Editorial Office Manager JOURNAL OF POST KEYNESIAN ECONOMICS SMC 501 Department of Economics University of Tennessee Knoxville, Tennessee 37996-0550 phone: (865) 974-4221 fax: (865) 974-1686



Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]