Re. the following:
So there we have it-the WSJ, the FED and the IMF warning us against the
dangers of deflation and frank admissions that falling prices don't bring
the economy back to full employment. It's as if I woke up on some bizarre
parallel universe where the WSJ excoriates Bush and the FED and the IMF
take
the GT seriously. There's got to be a catch somewhere.
Comment:
A deflationary threat in a world awash in liquidity should signal to the FED
and IMF that, through their somnolent watch over the world financial system
in the post-Bretton Woods era, they have sown the seeds of Japan-style
STRUCTURAL problems in the Global Economy.
Gunnar
----- Original Message -----
From: "Clifford Poirot" <cpoirot@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <pkt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2003 10:36 AM
Subject: Monday's WSJ Front Page and pg 15-triumph of the GT?
The front page and page 15 of Monday's WSJ are well worth a look and of
some
considerable interest to Post-Keynesians. Here is a brief synopsis:
"Caution: Tax Cuts Are Bigger Than They Appear in Budget" : While there is
some disagreement on this list over the desirability of tax cuts and
deficits, I don't think anybody on this list would approve of Bush's long
held strategy of using mirrors and gimmicks to redefine the size of the
tax
cuts. This article pretty much directly accuses Bush of lying and
hypocrisy.
"Newly Defined "strong dollar" Signals U.S. Shift": Now this one made me
almost burst out into raucous laughter and roll on my office floor-a
"strong
dollar" policy is no defined by Treasury Secretary John Snow as "general
public confidence" and "difficulty to counterfeit". Perhaps it can be used
in Bounty commercials too-a comparison test between the dollar and the
Euro?
Which one will hold up when wet...?. Again, clearly we have some
differences
on this list about the advisability and meaning of the current dollar
devaluation. And again, regardless of what one thinks about this (I'm in
favor) I wonder why is the Bush administration resorting to redefining
terms
rather than admitting what is going on?
I think it is significant politically that a paper that has practically
become the Republican Party propaganda page, takes Bush to task (far more
than the NYT has been willing to do) for his verbal sleight of hand on two
significant economic issues.
More interesting from a theoretical point of view is the FED's new found
concern on the problems of deflation "Having Defeated Inflation, FED girds
for New Foes: Falling Prices". Follow the story to page 8 where the IMF
now
says we need to prevent deflation, rather than fighting it.
So there we have it-the WSJ, the FED and the IMF warning us against the
dangers of deflation and frank admissions that falling prices don't bring
the economy back to full employment. It's as if I woke up on some bizarre
parallel universe where the WSJ excoriates Bush and the FED and the IMF
take
the GT seriously. There's got to be a catch somewhere.
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Get A Free Psychic Reading!
Your Online Answer To Life's Important Questions.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/aM1XQD/od7FAA/uetFAA/00hrlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
The gang8 list is devoted to Creditary Economics.
To unsubscribe, email: gang8-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/