|
With regard to
the subject header but not the content, we all know that Keynes asked the
question why would anyone hold part of their wealth in money rather than in
higher interest-bearing or profit-earning assets, and replied that there are
the transactions, precautionary and speculative motives for doing so, and later
added the finance motive, as Paul D. has taught us. Would the state theory of money imply that
“to pay taxes” should be added to the list as a separate item, or
does it fall under one of the others? |
- Re: Liquidity Preference and State Theory of Money, (continued)
- Re: Liquidity Preference and State Theory of Money, Harry Veeder Fri 02 May 2003, 14:37 GMT
- Re: Liquidity Preference and State Theory of Money, Gunnar Tomasson Thu 01 May 2003, 21:52 GMT
- Re: Liquidity Preference and State Theory of Money, Harry Veeder Sat 03 May 2003, 15:50 GMT
- Re: Liquidity Preference and State Theory of Money, Gunnar Tomasson Sat 03 May 2003, 15:51 GMT
- Re: Liquidity Preference and State Theory of Money, Forstater, Mathew Thu 01 May 2003, 22:20 GMT
- Re: Liquidity Preference and State Theory of Money, Warren Mosler Fri 02 May 2003, 01:50 GMT
- Re: Liquidity Preference and State Theory of Money, Gunnar Tomasson Fri 02 May 2003, 14:31 GMT
- Re: Liquidity Preference and State Theory of Money, Gunnar Tomasson Fri 02 May 2003, 14:28 GMT
- Re: Liquidity Preference and State Theory of Money, Ted Winslow Fri 02 May 2003, 14:30 GMT