Re: Trade policy

To: <Leigh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <pdavidson@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Trade policy
From: "Esteban Perez" <eperez@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 12:40:13 -0400
Cc: <pkt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

>>> paul davidson <pdavidson@xxxxxxx> 04/28/03 12:36pm >>> wrote:

 AND THAT FREE CAPITAL FLOWS
CAN BE HORRIBLY DISTRUCTIVE UNDER A FLEXIBLE EXCHANGE RATE SYSTEM --
―--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Is this independent of the state of the current account of the balance of payments and the type of capital flows?.

Prev by Date: Re: Trade policy
Next by Date: Re: What is Full Employment?
Previous by thread: Re: Trade policy
Next by thread: Fwd: Re: Trade policy
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Re: Trade policy, (continued)
  - Re: Trade policy, pdavidso Mon 28 Apr 2003, 01:39 GMT
  - Re: Trade policy, Clifford Poirot Mon 28 Apr 2003, 15:30 GMT
  - Re: Trade policy, Esteban Perez Mon 28 Apr 2003, 17:18 GMT
  - Fwd: Re: Trade policy, paul davidson Mon 28 Apr 2003, 18:16 GMT
- Fed vs White House, Henry C.K. Liu Sat 26 Apr 2003, 15:23 GMT
  - Re: Fed vs White House, Warren Mosler Sat 26 Apr 2003, 21:21 GMT
  - <Possible follow-up(s)>
  - Re: Fed vs White House, pdavidso Sat 26 Apr 2003, 16:36 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]