Paul Davidson writes:
[When the international capital markets seized up in the Fall of 1998 -- I actually was called to the UN in Geneva for a private meeting of finace ministers and central bankers from many countries -- besides the G7 -- so that my IMCU plan could be discussed-- and a diplimatic format for such a proposal be arranged. Unfortunately, while some were working on the diplomatic format, the world was able to muddle through -- and the proposal was abandoned.]
But, of course, why should we discusss such sensible proposals -- when there are esoteric papers presented at the New University .
Paul
These are not my papers nor my conference, but I really urge you try to actually READ the papers before characterizing them. Some were just posted at: http://www.newschool.edu/cepa/events/globmyths03.htm the rest will no doubt be available shortly.
You will note that many of the authors drew heavily on their experience as serious players in decades of meetings on Lac Leman (not to mention at the Bank and Fund) including as key advisors, U.N. and World Bank officials, and senior government players. I know it is rare to find people who have spent many years in both worlds but they do exist :-)
Paul A.
- Re: Savings and NIPA, (continued)
- Re: Savings and NIPA, Gunnar Tomasson Mon 28 Apr 2003, 01:46 GMT
- A Third Way?, John Vertegaal Sat 26 Apr 2003, 18:20 GMT
- Re: A Third Way?, Henry C.K. Liu Sun 27 Apr 2003, 17:19 GMT
- Trade policy, pdavidso Sat 26 Apr 2003, 16:37 GMT
- Re: Trade policy, Paul Altesman Sun 27 Apr 2003, 02:16 GMT
- Re: Trade policy, Henry C.K. Liu Sun 27 Apr 2003, 16:41 GMT
- Re: Trade policy, Leigh Harkness Mon 28 Apr 2003, 15:18 GMT
- Re: Trade policy, paul davidson Mon 28 Apr 2003, 16:44 GMT
- Re: Trade policy, Leigh Harkness Tue 29 Apr 2003, 15:33 GMT