Re: notre dame

To: "pdavidso" <pdavidso@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: notre dame
From: "Forstater, Mathew" <ForstaterM@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 16:09:43 -0500
Cc: <pkt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: AcMDkctndemfDdavSz+CVhrPhfZY7AAAsQ7w
Thread-topic: notre dame

The report on graduate education Paul mentions and another on
undergraduate education from around the same time both supported all of
the things we have been saying for years--no math for math's sake, make
sure there is room for economic history and history of thought, be open
to alternative perspectives, etc.  And nothing ever happened.

Prev by Date: Re: notre dame
Next by Date: Re: What is Creditary Economics?
Previous by thread: Re: notre dame
Next by thread: Re: notre dame
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Post Mortem Political Economy, John Gelles Thu 17 Apr 2003, 00:09 GMT
- Membership, Harry L. Cook Thu 17 Apr 2003, 00:08 GMT
- Re: notre dame, Forstater, Mathew Tue 15 Apr 2003, 20:09 GMT
  - <Possible follow-up(s)>
  - Re: notre dame, pdavidso Tue 15 Apr 2003, 21:22 GMT
  - Re: notre dame, Forstater, Mathew Tue 15 Apr 2003, 21:35 GMT
  - Re: notre dame, Forstater, Mathew Tue 15 Apr 2003, 22:00 GMT
- Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details, paul davidson Tue 15 Apr 2003, 16:56 GMT
  - <Possible follow-up(s)>
  - FWD: Returned mail: see transcript for details, pdavidso Wed 16 Apr 2003, 15:54 GMT
  - FWD: Returned mail: see transcript for details, pdavidso Wed 16 Apr 2003, 18:07 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]