PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: The conflict at Notre Dame
Message text written by INTERNET:pkt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>How does the kind of math econ you are defending keep these
> implications [of the ontological fact of internal relations for the
> use of axiomatic, mathematical and quantitative methods] in mind?<
Does the mastery of a 'fruitful' mthematicl model not also reveal--the more
deeply you pursue it--the model's limiitations, self-contradictions, etc,
and in that way doesn't such a mathematical model force the 'ontoilogical
fact of internal relations' upon you in a way nothing else can? That
seems to me what gives the 'fruitful'models much of their value.
It is ever thus that, in the words of Goethe:
Gray, my friend, is every theory
and green alone life's golden trees.
DG
'
- Thread context:
- Re: The conflict at Notre Dame, (continued)
- Re: The conflict at Notre Dame,
pdavidso Fri 07 Mar 2003, 21:31 GMT
- Re: The conflict at Notre Dame,
Colin Danby Fri 07 Mar 2003, 21:31 GMT
- Re: The conflict at Notre Dame,
Trond Andresen Fri 07 Mar 2003, 21:31 GMT
- Re: The conflict at Notre Dame,
Ted Winslow Fri 07 Mar 2003, 21:33 GMT
- Re: The conflict at Notre Dame,
David Gleicher Sat 08 Mar 2003, 21:28 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]