ReOrient global Keynesianism (5) - Galbraith The sharp increase in global inequality after 1981, as diagnosed by Galbraith (see below), coincides with a sharp increase after 1981 of unequal exchange between non-OECD and OECD countries (see Figure 1 below). Gernot Köhler ------------ Galbraith quotation ------------------ Reference: "Free marketeers putting on a poor show" by James K. Galbraith, *The Age* (Australia), 27 July 2001 [quote] . . . the global trend in inequality was stable in the 1960s, slightly downward in the 1970s, and up sharply after 1981 and since. What accounts for this? Technology? Trade? We think not. Rather, the timing points mainly at the quasi-violent financial regime change of the early 1980s: rising real interest rates, debt crises and the triumph of private global finance. In many ways the pattern resembles what we find in individual countries (such as Chile) after a coup d'etat. And so to policy. Above all, we think it clear that the financial order of the past 28 years cannot deliver sustainable economic development worldwide. Therefore it is necessary to rebuild an architecture of financial stabilisation and control similar to the old Bretton Woods system, but better suited to our multi-polar world. [end quote] ----------- Figure 1 ---------------------------------------- Unequal exchange (Global T-value), 1960-98 [Figure 1 is attached as a jpg file 44 KB] (The T value measures the annual income loss incurred by periphery and semi-periphery countries due to unfair exchange rates - for example, an aggregate loss of 1.7 trillion dollars in the late 1990s) Reference: Figure 1 from: G. Köhler, "Time Series of Unequal Exchange, 1960-1998," in: G. Köhler and E.J. Chaves (eds), Globalization: Critical Perspectives. Nova Science, USA, 2003 (see, amazon.com)
Attachment:
Kohler, Figure 1, Unequal Exchange 1960-98.jpg
Description: JPEG image
- Re: Why Heterodox are subject to be losers., (continued)
- Re: Why Heterodox are subject to be losers., Ted Winslow Wed 19 Mar 2003, 17:50 GMT
- Re: Why Heterodox are subject to be losers., Gunnar Tomasson Wed 19 Mar 2003, 19:29 GMT
- Re: Why Heterodox are subject to be losers., Warren Mosler Wed 19 Mar 2003, 20:35 GMT
- Re: Why Heterodox are subject to be losers., Forstater, Mathew Wed 19 Mar 2003, 15:02 GMT
- ReOrient global Keynesianism (5) - Galbraith, g kohler Wed 05 Mar 2003, 20:25 GMT
- Re: ReOrient global Keynesianism (5) - Galbraith, Warren Mosler Wed 05 Mar 2003, 22:10 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: ReOrient global Keynesianism (5) - Galbraith, Forstater, Mathew Fri 07 Mar 2003, 01:50 GMT
- Re: ReOrient global Keynesianism (5) - Galbraith, Warren Mosler Fri 07 Mar 2003, 21:29 GMT
- Re: ReOrient global Keynesianism (5) - Galbraith, g kohler Fri 07 Mar 2003, 01:50 GMT