Re: Consumption Inequality

To: post keynesian thought <pkt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Consumption Inequality
From: Harry Veeder <eo200@xxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 13:34:54 +0100
User-agent: Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.0.3

This just an opinion based on an observation, but banks may not benefit from
government debt. Currently, Canadians banks are declaring big profits in
this era of balanced budgets.

Harry Veeder

> From: helmet4000@xxxxxxx
> Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 16:42:43 -0500
> To: pkt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Consumption Inequality
>
> PKT,
>
> Would banks support politicians who run deficits more than politicians who do
> not?  If banks can earn substantial money from servicing the interest, then
> would it not make sense for the banking community to nod in approval to gov't
> debt?
>
> -Tom Volscho

References:
- Consumption Inequality
  - From: helmet4000

Prev by Date: Consumption Inequality
Next by Date: Why Isn't the Fed's Medicine Working?
Previous by thread: Consumption Inequality
Next by thread: Why Isn't the Fed's Medicine Working?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Sibling Rivalry, Henry C.K. Liu Sat 30 Nov 2002, 20:49 GMT
- economic development syllabus, David Dequech Sat 30 Nov 2002, 16:47 GMT
- Why Isn't the Fed's Medicine Working?, Finmktctr Mon 25 Nov 2002, 16:35 GMT
- Consumption Inequality, helmet4000 Sat 23 Nov 2002, 16:50 GMT
  - Re: Consumption Inequality, Harry Veeder Sat 23 Nov 2002, 21:40 GMT
- heterodox econ job ad, Lee, Frederic Sat 23 Nov 2002, 16:47 GMT
- 8th Vienna Workshop on Optimal Control ..., Richard Hartl Sat 23 Nov 2002, 16:41 GMT
- pkt, Ric Holt Sat 16 Nov 2002, 16:57 GMT
- eaepe 2002 conference, Lee, Frederic Sat 16 Nov 2002, 16:41 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]