PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Incomes policies
As Paul Davidson related on this list sometime ago in a personal antedote,
every economists supports income policies. They just don't like the income
policy of other economists.
Supplysiders have been advocating various income policies for corporations for
a long time.
Henry C.K. Liu
Bill James wrote:
> Incomes policies seem to be recommended often by heterodoxers. Is this
> still the case, or were new ideas devised regarding this(for example is
> Lerner's MAP recommended at all nowadays?)? The failure of incomes policies
> in the United States in the 70s under Nixon and Carter are well known, and
> I don't see any particular failure in implementation(unless someone can
> point them out), rather than an overall failure in the policy. Austria,
> Germany, and Sweden certainly withstood the supply shocks in the 70s much
> better, but only continued successfully in conjunction to traditional
> deflationary policies in the 80s, as growth was very slow for all three in
> that decade.
>
> _____________________________________________
> Free email with personality! Over 200 domains!
> http://www.MyOwnEmail.com
- Thread context:
- Re: A priorism v. realism: was RE: Paul D. on this year's Nobel - Addendum, (continued)
- position for het labor econ,
Lee, Frederic Tue 15 Oct 2002, 21:07 GMT
- Radical Policy Change vs. Professional Estimate of Future Effect,
John Gelles Tue 15 Oct 2002, 21:04 GMT
- Incomes policies,
Bill James Tue 15 Oct 2002, 14:41 GMT
- Trading models change. The Economy persists.,
John Gelles Tue 15 Oct 2002, 14:41 GMT
- "Wealth and Democracy" , K.P.'s book,
John Gelles Mon 14 Oct 2002, 03:31 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]