|
Re. the following:
I submit that there is not an iota of difference
between Mill's concluding remarks and Keynes 1922 definition - in which, perhaps
not so incidentally, Keynes repeats the one word in Mill's summary with which
one can take exception, "correctly":
"The Theory of Economics does not furnish a body of settled
conclusions immediately applicable to a policy. It is a method rather than
a doctrine, an apparatus of the mind, a technique of thinking, which helps its
possessor to draw correct conclusions."
Addendum.
It occurred to me as I wrote the above that the
John Maynard Keynes of 1922 was not conveying his own message on the
concept of "the Theory of Economics" - that, instead, his was a copy-cat
statement of John Stuart Mill's (and, although this came to light much later,
Jeremy Bentham's) lucid concept thereof.
For if Keynes, after thinking it through, had arrived
at an independent conclusion on the concept of "the Theory of Economics",
then he could not have persuaded himself by the early 1930s that the
General Theory - a piece of work that makes believe that "The Theory of
Economics" does "furnish a body of settled conclusions immediately
applicable to a policy" - was the way to go.
In this respect, it is a matter of record that Dennis
Robertson, after working for years with Keynes on monetary theory in the 1920s
leading to the Treatise on Money, became intellectually estranged
from Keynes as he changed course and, incongruously, sought to emulate
Albert Einstein's achievement in theoretical physics by developing a
General Theory of real-world economics.
It is also a matter of record that Schumpeter who, after
receiving a copy of the Treatise from Keynes, deemed it
to represent a "landmark" achievement, was intellectually contemptuous of the
General Theory which Keynes developed in cooperation with the
Cambridge Circus for whom the Bentham/Mill concept of "the Theory of Economics"
was nonsense - because incomprehensible.
That is, incomprehensible to them.
Gunnar
|
- 09-11-02, William B. Ryan Thu 12 Sep 2002, 20:03 GMT
- Re: progress, William B. Ryan Thu 12 Sep 2002, 19:58 GMT
- FW: Job Opening: International Economics, Lee, Frederic Wed 11 Sep 2002, 21:16 GMT
- Re. Statistical Method and Economics, Gunnar Tomasson Wed 11 Sep 2002, 14:07 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Re. Statistical Method and Economics, Gunnar Tomasson Thu 12 Sep 2002, 19:55 GMT
- Money vs. Wealth, John Gelles Wed 11 Sep 2002, 14:06 GMT
- Restoring Demand in the World Economy (Halevi - Fontaine), Gernot Koehler Wed 11 Sep 2002, 03:20 GMT
- OTTAWA CONFERENCE, Mario Seccareccia Wed 11 Sep 2002, 03:17 GMT
- The purpose of taxes, John Gelles Wed 11 Sep 2002, 03:14 GMT