PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Money vs. Wealth
. GLOBAL WEALTH TO END WANT MUST
NOT BE HELD HOSTAGE TO MONEY
PROFITS IMPOSSIBLE TO COME BY
AND EMPTY OF PROMISE
UNDER CURRENT CAPITALISTIC SYSTEMS
Reformers must not seek to return to the profit
system in place between 1950 and 1965. It was not
that much different, logically, than the system we have
which is admittedly worse.
Everyone wants profits--but only to turn them into
wealth in the form a real water, food, homes, fac-
tories, schools, farms, mines, laboratories, know-
ledge systems, etc.
But profits by definition dry up cash flows from
the poor needed to grow wealth for human and
planetary security. For every dollar dried up,
a new system, (to reform the old,) must spend a
dollar to replace it.
I'm open to anyone's advice of how to do this.
I am not open to the idea that we already did it
post 1950 and before the death of the welfare
state idea. Poverty and unemployment was
common enough in those years. A few nations
avoided it, like Japan, by exporting things as
others exported jobs. But what followed the
rebuilding of Japan and Europe was not a recipe
for the 21st century.
If we would end want where it hurts so bad now
we must think hard and suggest how to do it.
Johannesburg and New York hosted conferences
by elites (bureaucrats in J. and plutocrats in NY)
aimed at economic development. Puerto Allegre
too tried its best. None of the three explained
that money spent to green the world and end
want can represent new wealth NOT old debt.
The world is awash in debt and some of it
represents money. But we must be awash in
real things, water, sewers, food, etc., and
all of it can represent new money.
I do not insist that there be no taxes, IF and
only IF, we unlock production potentials
in Japan, Germany, the US, Australia, etc.,
etc., to create the wealth we need that the
profit system denies us for lack of coherent
arithmetic.
Karl Marx was right: capitalism,
without radical monetary reform, takes all
the purchasing power of labor and squeezes
it dry of real money. Hence it is self-limiting
--far ahead of the time when an enriched labor
force would go to the beach all day and see
no need to work.
Please reformers--enough of what we did at
the time of the original Marshall Plan.
The need now is trillions. The
cost of the old system you remember, which
paid nothing for its trail of environmental
damage, was falsely accounted for to yield
temporary profits.
What we need now is an honest
plan to spend--not at the mall and Walmart--
but in the halls of Congress. We must explain
to ordinary people how such spending
(modeled on winning wars) can be accom-
plished, how any inflation can be managed,
and how the real wealth necessary for human
survuval can be produced in democracies
around the world.
We seek freedom from want--not freedom
from thought.
John Gelles
- Thread context:
- Re: progress,
William B. Ryan Thu 12 Sep 2002, 19:58 GMT
- FW: Job Opening: International Economics,
Lee, Frederic Wed 11 Sep 2002, 21:16 GMT
- Re. Statistical Method and Economics,
Gunnar Tomasson Wed 11 Sep 2002, 14:07 GMT
- Money vs. Wealth,
John Gelles Wed 11 Sep 2002, 14:06 GMT
- Restoring Demand in the World Economy (Halevi - Fontaine),
Gernot Koehler Wed 11 Sep 2002, 03:20 GMT
- OTTAWA CONFERENCE,
Mario Seccareccia Wed 11 Sep 2002, 03:17 GMT
- The purpose of taxes,
John Gelles Wed 11 Sep 2002, 03:14 GMT
- 10th Value Theory Conference, CFP,
Drewk Sun 08 Sep 2002, 17:59 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]