PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Heterodoxers are crackpots
See
interspersed responses
<snip>
There is
no such thing as infinite precision! All valid statistical predictions
come with an associated standard error!
And that error will increase with time bounded by the appropriate
Lyapunov exponent. For a system to be ergodic the Lyapunov exponent would
have to be zero or negative, with prediction and reality converging; but for all
known complex systems the exponent is positive and the errors in predictions
increase with time.
<snip>
even for next
year, since practically all of them involve either limited
liability
companies or sovereign states, either of whom can dishonour
contracts by
citing force majeure.
They can cite what they
want, but they must prove it in a court of law or else the State will enforce
compliance -- or a payment in monetary damages.! That much is
certain!
Had my retirement savings
a year ago been
in Argentine bonds and Enron energy futures, insured by
HIH Ltd, I would
probably not be sleeping very soundly
tonight.
HIH
was a limited liability insurance company with whom many Australians and
Canadians had executed insurance contracts. When HIH got into difficulty
it appointed receivers who voided all outstanding insurance contracts perfectly
legally. Enron sold future contracts to deliver energy; again, faced with
losses it invoked Chapter 11 and voided the contracts, perfectly
legally.
Since
1846 in England, and only a little later in the US limited liability has become
a standard feature of incorporation such that creditors have no recourse to
shareholders in the event of bankruptcy. In Australia ASIC, the SEC
equivalent, does not even take action against directors of failed companies as
long as creditors get at least 50 cents in the dollar and there are no smoking
guns exposed to public view. US practice is, I understand, similar.
Put brutally, half the value of any contract with a corporation can be voided at
the will of its directors without any penalty. The directors can void the
other half if they have preserved enough of the company's cash in their private
accounts to buy lawyers capable of persuading a jury that acts of outright fraud
were merely acts carried out in good faith by persons of honest, if flawed,
judgement.
So what does that tell
you - namely that asset prices are NOT generated by an ergodic
stochastic process. But we do have institutions built in to financial
markets that suppose to maintain orderliness in the changing of asset
prices.
<snip>
OTH if Bruce's
entrepreneur was considering buying a country
franchise for Coca Cola
he/she could do so with very considerable confidence
(plus or minus one
percent at the one sigma level) in next year's
product
sales.
Is that sigma statistically determined?
The
rate of change of market share for fast moving consumer goods such as Coca Cola
has been intensively studied over a period of at least sixty years by people
familiar with advanced statistical tools. Year on year changes are
generally less than one per cent,
JML
Paul Davidson
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]