Re: Babel and babylonian

To: David Dequech <dequech@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Babel and babylonian
From: Paul Davidson <pdavidson@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 11:15:26 -0500
Cc: pkt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

At 11:38 AM 8/26/02 -0300, you wrote:

Dear PKTers,

Leonardo wrote:
>There is no need for 'heterodox approaches" to be a logical tower of Babel.
> They could be babylonians modes of thought in the sense of their
>adaptability in the face of different problems.
>
>Leonardo Vera

I wonder if this particular phrasing wouldn't make Paul's job easier, since
Babel and Babylonian are variations of the exact same word.
Jokingly,
David


Unfortunately David its no joke.

Paul
Paul Davidson
Editor, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics
Economics Department - 523 SMC
University of Tennessee
Knoxville, Tennessee 37996-0550
phone # (865) 974-4221
fax # (865) 974-1686
home phone  (865) 692-0802
http://econ.bus.utk.edu/davidsonextra/Davidson.html

References:
- Babel and babylonian
  - From: David Dequech

Prev by Date: Re: Heterodoxers are crackpots
Next by Date: Babel and babylonian
Previous by thread: Babel and babylonian
Next by thread: Method
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Re: Method, (continued)
  - Re: Method, Bruce McFarling Thu 29 Aug 2002, 16:47 GMT
  - Re: Method, Dr. Bruce McFarling Sat 31 Aug 2002, 15:56 GMT
- Babel and babylonian, David Dequech Tue 27 Aug 2002, 15:22 GMT
  - Re: Babel and babylonian, Paul Davidson Tue 27 Aug 2002, 15:19 GMT
- Re: heterodoxers are crackpots AND logic, Andrew Mearman Tue 27 Aug 2002, 14:45 GMT
  - Re: heterodoxers are crackpots AND logic, Paul Davidson Tue 27 Aug 2002, 15:57 GMT
    - Re: heterodoxers are crackpots AND logic, Andrew Mearman Wed 28 Aug 2002, 00:23 GMT
      
      Re: heterodoxers are crackpots AND logic, Paul Davidson Wed 28 Aug 2002, 15:35 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]