|
Arguments supporting globalization on the grounds that it creates rising
incomes in the
less developed countries are misleading because they are probably true and, therefore, (superficially) persuasive. But they ignore the fundamentals. Globalization creates rising incomes in the economic enclaves that directly benefit from the foreign investment. But they generally involve deals with the existing power structure, which is usually the main obstacle to the changes in institutional structure required to bring about the kind of philosophical, political, legal, educational and economic changes required for economic development for the country as a whole. Harry L. Cook ----- Original Message |
- Re: government, markets, and material well-being, (continued)
- Re: government, markets, and material well-being, Henry C.K. Liu Wed 28 Aug 2002, 04:40 GMT
- Re: government, markets, and material well-being, Alan G Isaac Wed 28 Aug 2002, 18:56 GMT
- Re: government, markets, and material well-being, Alan G Isaac Wed 28 Aug 2002, 19:14 GMT
- Re: government, markets, and material well-being, Henry C.K. Liu Tue 27 Aug 2002, 14:44 GMT
- Globalization, Harry L. Cook Mon 26 Aug 2002, 15:30 GMT
- Heterodoxy, Harry L. Cook Mon 26 Aug 2002, 15:29 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Heterodoxy, mongiovg Mon 26 Aug 2002, 19:51 GMT
- Re: Heterodoxy, Harry L. Cook Mon 26 Aug 2002, 21:40 GMT
- Re: Prospects vs Forecasts/Was Minsky non-ergodic?, Clifford Poirot Sun 25 Aug 2002, 00:14 GMT