PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Keynes and the balance of payments (1946)
I'd agree strongly with Ted and add a slightly more PE gloss. Smith assumes
a more-or-less feudal society, with approrpriate values and mores and a very
clear class structure, which tells people how to behave. This is what
provides stability. To a degree Smith's psychology is also a way of talking
about class. (The kind of psychology he does also bespeaks Smith's
strenuous effort to develop a theory that did not rely on individual
rationality, something little-appreciated today.)
Keynes, especially the late Keynes, is very much in tune with Smith's
conservatism along these lines -- Skidelsky was right to emphasize the
Burkean aspect of Keynes' thinking. Stability can be traced to convention
and habit (I'm reading King's _Conversations with Post Keynesians_ and Dow,
on page 157, makes the point nicely). You can think of the consumption
function for example as having a psychology or a class basis.
Best, Colin
- Thread context:
- Re: Keynes and the balance of payments (1946), (continued)
- Re: Keynes and the balance of payments (1946),
Ted Winslow Sat 17 Aug 2002, 15:07 GMT
- Re: Keynes and the balance of payments (1946),
John Vertegaal Fri 16 Aug 2002, 14:30 GMT
- Re: Keynes and the balance of payments (1946),
Esteban Perez Fri 16 Aug 2002, 14:33 GMT
- Re: Keynes and the balance of payments (1946),
Colin Danby Sat 17 Aug 2002, 23:17 GMT
- Re: Keynes and the balance of payments (1946),
Esteban Perez Mon 19 Aug 2002, 14:54 GMT
- Re: Keynes and the balance of payments (1946),
Ted Winslow Mon 19 Aug 2002, 15:43 GMT
- Re: Keynes and the balance of payments (1946),
Esteban Perez Mon 19 Aug 2002, 15:52 GMT
- Re: Keynes and the balance of payments (1946),
Esteban Perez Mon 19 Aug 2002, 16:15 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]