Re: more squiggly lines

[John Vertegaal <vertegaa@xxxxxxxxx>]

Doesn't this entire discussion reduce to the fact that man and thus
science, is limited to seek the truth following induced axioms;
while Gunnar's argument is that the (usually implicit) axioms are
neither "facts" nor knowable, thus throwing everything into doubt?
  If so, then it may be more productive to challenge economists on
what assumptions their assertions are based on; and question their
relevance, instead of invoking Newton and/or Einstein on this PKT
forum.

John V