Re: more squiggly lines

To: <aisaac@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <pkt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: more squiggly lines
From: "Gunnar Tomasson" <gunnar.tomasson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 18:07:31 -0400

Alan:

My offer stands:

> > I shall be pleased to respond to any substantive comment you may have on
my
> > proposition that Newton's Equations were, are, and will ever remain
> > DESCRIPTIVE - that is, NON-EXPLANATORY - of observed orbital mechanics.

But, as may have dawned on you, another shoe is set to drop as soon as you
take issue with this proposition.

And, of course, the point should not be lost on anyone on the PKT list that
your construction of Newton's Equations and Words happens to accord with
your construction of the equation stuff which comprises your intellectual
capital.

Gunnar

Follow-Ups:
- Re: more squiggly lines
  - From: Alan G Isaac

References:
- Fwd: more squiggly lines
  - From: William B. Ryan
- Re: more squiggly lines
  - From: Gunnar Tomasson
- Re: more squiggly lines
  - From: Alan G Isaac
- Re: more squiggly lines
  - From: Gunnar Tomasson
- Re: more squiggly lines
  - From: Alan G Isaac
- Re: more squiggly lines
  - From: Gunnar Tomasson
- Re: more squiggly lines
  - From: Alan G Isaac

Prev by Date: Re: more squiggly lines
Next by Date: Re: more squiggly lines
Previous by thread: Re: more squiggly lines
Next by thread: Re: more squiggly lines
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Re: more squiggly lines, (continued)

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]