PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: more squiggly lines
Alan:
Re. the following:
> Actually what I argued in the text that you failed to quote is that
> your ability to quote Newton in support of the point you were trying
> to make "works" only because you ignore almost everything he wrote and
> indeed further ignore the evident meaning of the paragraph you
> selected. If you care to take up that specific point, feel free.
The ball is in your park.
I shall be pleased to respond to any substantive comment you may have on my
proposition that Newton's Equations were, are, and will ever remain
DESCRIPTIVE - that is, NON-EXPLANATORY - of observed orbital mechanics.
Gunnar
- Thread context:
- Re: more squiggly lines, (continued)
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]