PKT
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

Re: more squiggly lines



Alan:

Re. the following:

> Actually what I argued in the text that you failed to quote is that
> your ability to quote Newton in support of the point you were trying
> to make "works" only because you ignore almost everything he wrote and
> indeed further ignore the evident meaning of the paragraph you
> selected.  If you care to take up that specific point, feel free.

The ball is in your park.

I shall be pleased to respond to any substantive comment you may have on my
proposition that Newton's Equations were, are, and will ever remain
DESCRIPTIVE - that is, NON-EXPLANATORY - of observed orbital mechanics.

Gunnar







Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]