PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Balancing Demand to Supply, Supply to Need
Worldwide poverty is old news. But it must be the
starting point for reform of the global economy and
the search for peace in a world dripping with hate.
Money can be used to ensure that the poor can buy
needed surplus production from any place able to
export it.
This use of money will hold up world prices for all
things needed by the poor that would otherwise not
be sold at a sufficient profit to keep wages high in
the exporting nations.
We know there will be definite risk that prices so
protected for exporters may get higher than anyone
wants -- that is too high for an export nation's
workers who are not rich -- but who get no help
in buying their needs because they are not poor.
The solution to the inflationary effect of increasing
demand at the bottom of the income pyramid is to
reward savers who wait to buy their needs until
supply at affordable prices can catch up with all
the newly created demand.
That is to say, savings must be indexed to
increase as fast as prices -- and supply must
be raised to increase as fast as possible (with
no harm to the environment).
So far things look too simple: Print money or stamps
to supply the poor. Index savings to protect the middle
class. What more is necessary?
The "more" is the detailed system to raise supply.
The system requires technological success as well
as investment techniques that do not fail for lack
materials, parts, know-how, sustainable profit, etc.
In short, the problem that is not simple always boils
down to supply -- when a government is smart enough
to print money or stamps to ensure demand is never
wanting. But supply of WHAT? Not the supply of
of fad and fashion impulse advertised stuff! Only
the supply of actual needs has to be guaranteed at
prices all can afford (even if helped by stamps --
which can be thought of as Paul Riesz' secondary
money -- even if its not negotiable currency).
Note, there is no requirement for government to
balance its spending with botrrowed money or
taxes. Price alone governs the spending system.
And science and technology can lower price
far better than anything else. The bogeyman of
an insufficiency of government revenue when
high tech systems lower price as they raise
supply has to be laid to rest.
We went off the gold standard. It is time to
get off the tax and borrow train and take the
new economy express built by diminishing
marginal cost systems in an era of more of
the things that money can buy than money.
An era that needs injected (not borrowed
or taxed) demand to stay stable.
Failure to comprehend the above facts may well
cost Bush the nest two elections. It may cost the
world another great war.
John Gelles
- Thread context:
- Kaldor's 1939 paper,
Esteban Perez Thu 18 Jul 2002, 21:58 GMT
- Kaldor´s 1939 paper,
Esteban Perez Thu 18 Jul 2002, 14:41 GMT
- pipeline,
William B. Ryan Tue 16 Jul 2002, 19:39 GMT
- Balancing Demand to Supply, Supply to Need,
John Gelles Tue 16 Jul 2002, 04:11 GMT
- on Kaldor's paper,
Kazuhiro Kurose Tue 16 Jul 2002, 04:08 GMT
- Re: A Question about Fundamentals,
William B. Ryan Sat 13 Jul 2002, 16:52 GMT
- The Global Keynesianism of Stiglitz,
g kohler Sat 13 Jul 2002, 16:52 GMT
- Re. Rogoff contra Stiglitz,
Gunnar Tomasson Thu 11 Jul 2002, 23:45 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]