|
"All that Third World investment requires is that a
good slice of the investment spending is into the local market, not on
components shipped in from the Firsdt World which are then assembled by imported
First World technicians fed on shipped in provisions. It also requires that the
local banks do not go haywire with credit creation, and that the local
government allows sound money to be spent in local currency in the local
marketplace."
Chris,
I like the above.
It's important that the supplier/investor and the
recipient work together. We want projects jointly planned, jointly
implemented.
We want as much as possible or practicable provided
locally.
Again, I do not see it as a handout arrangement or as an
"aid" program in the sense that term has been used in the past.
That's why I've talked about resemblances to the
Marshall Plan and the EU. The projects then become a learning process, an
investment process, a development process for everyone.
When the school is built, there's something more than just
a school on a particular site.
There are people who can build more schools. Something has
been learned about how you can get local finance as well as perhaps some
external finance.
People will have learned to do the best deal with
educational equipment suppliers - including computer makers, software and so
on.
So it will be with health and the environment, with
transport and communications.
A lot of modern technology in the communications field
would be valuable in developing areas and would lead them in directions which
would be self-perpetuating for income and wealth.
Infrastructure for transport, modern rail and road
systems, port facilities - all of these are needed and again can be both an
earning process and a learning process for everyone.
These are things we should think about actively and get
that planning process going as soon as we can.
We should have integrated programs - not just a program
for clean water and nothing else.
Not a program for schools only which can't be properly
sustained because there isn't the infrastructure needed or the other investment
that will promote continuing higher income and accumulating wealth.
That's what VOW has in mind.
James Cumes
|
- participants for history of heterodox econ conference, Lee, Frederic Wed 12 Jun 2002, 14:56 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- FW: participants for history of heterodox econ conference, Lee, Frederic Tue 18 Jun 2002, 18:06 GMT
- Krugman on Rove, Henry C.K. Liu Wed 12 Jun 2002, 00:10 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Krugman on Rove, Clifford Poirot Wed 12 Jun 2002, 12:35 GMT
- Re: [gang8] How to spread prosperity, Schulte-baeuminghaus Tue 11 Jun 2002, 19:22 GMT
- Re: The argument, Schulte-baeuminghaus Sun 09 Jun 2002, 20:02 GMT
- Will Micawberism be enough?, Schulte-baeuminghaus Sun 09 Jun 2002, 08:44 GMT
- Micawberism, Schulte-baeuminghaus Sun 09 Jun 2002, 08:01 GMT
- Re: Food: When is it a right or a handout?, Henry Schappach Sun 09 Jun 2002, 01:55 GMT