|
Chris,
That is the whole idea behind VOW - to apply a process and
assessment system which will ensure - as well as may be - that "investment" in
the Third World is very different from what it has been in most TW countries in
the past.
You seem almost to be saying that, because some investment
has been unwise and unproductive, we should abandon all investment. That some
fails does not alter the fact that you can't succeed in advancing living levels,
in any continuing and worthwhile way, without real investment (in
well-researched, keenly evaluated, well-managed projects).
As to the barriers to investment, some might remain; some
might go. What we don't want is the sort of open slather for American and other
developed-country investment which might bring some benefit to the recipient but
which is characterised much more by the income, wealth and power it confers
on the "donors", especially the TNCs.
You'll never have 100% success in investments, no matter
how hard you try to appraise them well, eliminate corruption and be fair to
overseas investors as well as locals.
But the VOW process is most likely to get satisfactory
results. Of course, too, it brings the recipients into the process of
evaluation, of financing, of management. It is a learning process as well as an
investment process.
By the way, never forget that VOW is not just for the
undernourished and starving or even, more generally, for poor
countries.
It is for poor people everywhere and it applies
macroeconomic policies to maintain healthy growth and stability in the rich
countries as well as the poor.
That is essential. We don't want handouts - except of
course for those already starving and who can't wait. We don't want a system
that helps the poor but hurts the rich. Desirably we want arrangements from
which the rich can see that they derive benefits as well as the poor whose need
may be more basic and urgent.
It can be done; but we need to develop a belief that we
can and the political will to go for it.
James Cumes
|
- Re: Food: When is it a right or a handout?, (continued)
- Re: Food: When is it a right or a handout?, Harry Veeder Thu 13 Jun 2002, 02:21 GMT
- Re: Food: When is it a right or a handout?, larson Thu 13 Jun 2002, 18:25 GMT
- Re: Food: When is it a right or a handout?, Harry Veeder Thu 13 Jun 2002, 02:10 GMT
- Re: Food: When is it a right or a handout?, Bruce McFarling Thu 13 Jun 2002, 06:21 GMT
- Re: [gang8] VOW investment, Schulte-baeuminghaus Sat 08 Jun 2002, 10:45 GMT
- Food: When is it a right or a handout?, Harry Veeder Sat 08 Jun 2002, 17:18 GMT
- Re: Food: When is it a right or a handout?, Alan G Isaac Thu 13 Jun 2002, 15:29 GMT
- Re: Food: When is it a right or a handout?, Harry Veeder Fri 14 Jun 2002, 03:26 GMT
- Re: Time?, Bruce McFarling Wed 05 Jun 2002, 03:24 GMT