PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: imcu questions
Re. the following:
> >And, in technical terms, what does THAT mean?
>
> >It means that newly created purchasing power placed in the hands of the
> >unemployed will secure for them a piece of the pie at the cost of those
who
> >provided factor inputs to the baking of the pie - in other words, it is
> >INCOME REDISTRIBUTION by monetary/govt. finance means.
>
> Surely this is assuming that the resources required to satisfy
> the newly created purchasing power are already employed?
Comment:
No. The argument is analogous to the more familiar proposition that
doubling everybody's nominal purchasing power overnight doubles the price
level - the level of factor employment does not enter into the picture.
Gunnar
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruce McFarling" <ecbm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <pkt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 6:26 AM
Subject: Re: imcu questions
- Thread context:
- Re: imcu questions, (continued)
- Re: imcu questions,
Gunnar Tomasson Sun 02 Jun 2002, 01:33 GMT
- Re: imcu questions,
William B. Ryan Mon 03 Jun 2002, 15:43 GMT
- Re: imcu questions,
Bruce McFarling Tue 04 Jun 2002, 10:27 GMT
- Re: imcu questions,
Gunnar Tomasson Tue 04 Jun 2002, 15:25 GMT
- Time?,
Mason Clark Tue 04 Jun 2002, 19:52 GMT
- Re: Time?,
John O'Donnell Wed 05 Jun 2002, 00:17 GMT
- Re: Time?,
Gunnar Tomasson Wed 05 Jun 2002, 01:13 GMT
- Re: imcu questions,
Bruce McFarling Tue 04 Jun 2002, 10:29 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]