John Nash on Game Theory

To: pkt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: John Nash on Game Theory
From: Fiona Maclachlan <fiona.maclachlan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 01 May 2002 11:53:51 -0400

?Nash said ?that he felt that game theory was like string
theory, a subject of great intrinsic intellectual interest
that the world wishes to imagine can be of some utility.?
(S. Nasar, A Beautiful Mind, p. 379)

--
Fiona Maclachlan
Associate Professor
Department of Economics & Finance,
Manhattan College
Riverdale, NY 10471

www.manhattan.edu/~fmaclach
718.862.7466

Prev by Date: Re: Does capitalism really need growth to survive?
Next by Date: Re: Does capitalism really need growth to survive?
Previous by thread: Oeconomicus Winter 2002
Next by thread: Re: Dollars and banknotes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Fwd: Re: Stiglitz on Soros, (continued)
  - Fwd: Re: Stiglitz on Soros, Paul Davidson Wed 15 May 2002, 14:49 GMT
- Re: Dollars and banknotes, William B. Ryan Thu 02 May 2002, 15:27 GMT
  - <Possible follow-up(s)>
  - Re: Dollars and banknotes, William B. Ryan Fri 03 May 2002, 03:46 GMT
    - Gov't Spending versus Private Borrowing to Drive Development, John Gelles Fri 03 May 2002, 14:26 GMT
- John Nash on Game Theory, Fiona Maclachlan Wed 01 May 2002, 15:52 GMT
- Oeconomicus Winter 2002, Lee, Frederic Wed 01 May 2002, 14:05 GMT
- Re: John Nash on TV, stephen block Wed 01 May 2002, 10:04 GMT
- Re: Game theory pathologies, Helen Tilley Wed 01 May 2002, 09:10 GMT
- Re: replenishment, William B. Ryan Wed 01 May 2002, 04:12 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]