Re: John Nash on TV

[stephen block <stephenb@xxxxxxxx>]

I suppose I should add that I would not be expecting that such a critical
review would focus on John Nash, or his work; only, as I said, the use to
which it has been put in the past two decades or so.

Stephen


> Glad to see you're keeping an open mind, Stephen.
>
> Roger
> -------------------------------------------
> Roger Koppl
> Professor of Economics and Finance
> Fairleigh Dickinson University
> Madison, NJ 07940
> USA
>
> World Wide Web: http://inside.fdu.edu/pt/koppl.html
> Internet: koppl@xxxxxxx
> Phone: (973) 443-8846
> Fax: (973) 443-8804
> -------------------------------------------
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Stephen block" <stephenb@xxxxxxxx>
> To: <pkt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 7:25 PM
> Subject: Re: John Nash on TV
>
>
>> I am wondering if anyone might be able to recommend a cogent, readable
>> critical analysis of game theory. Specifically I am interested in an
>> analysis of the use to which it was put, not so much a critique of the
>> technical mathematics of it. If it includes a critical review of the
> social
>> costs, the moral oblivion of it, the strategic trickery, so much the
> better.
>>
>> With appreciation,
>>
>> Stephen Block
>> Montreal
>> Office: 514 744 7135
>> efax: 954 212 5736
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>