Re: John Nash on TV

To: <pkt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: John Nash on TV
From: stephen block <stephenb@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 19:25:39 -0400
User-agent: Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.0.3

I am wondering if anyone might be able to recommend a cogent, readable
critical analysis of game theory. Specifically I am interested in an
analysis of the use to which it was put, not so much a critique of the
technical mathematics of it. If it includes a critical review of the social
costs, the moral oblivion of it, the strategic trickery, so much the better.

With appreciation,

Stephen Block
Montreal
Office: 514 744 7135
efax: 954 212 5736

Follow-Ups:
- Re: John Nash on TV
  - From: J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
- Re: John Nash on TV
  - From: Ian Murray
- Does capitalism really need growth to survive?
  - From: Barry Brooks
- Re: John Nash on TV
  - From: Roger Koppl

References:
- Skidelsky on Keynes on TV
  - From: Paul Davidson

Prev by Date: Re: [gang8] Private bank relationship with central banks
Next by Date: Re: John Nash on TV
Previous by thread: Skidelsky on Keynes on TV
Next by thread: Re: John Nash on TV
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Re: [gang8] Private bank relationship with central banks, William B. Ryan Mon 29 Apr 2002, 17:49 GMT
- Grad. Prog. advt for URPE Newsletter, Lee, Frederic Mon 29 Apr 2002, 17:12 GMT
  - <Possible follow-up(s)>
  - Re: Grad. Prog. advt for URPE Newsletter, R A M Titumir Tue 30 Apr 2002, 10:45 GMT
- Skidelsky on Keynes on TV, Paul Davidson Mon 29 Apr 2002, 01:04 GMT
  - Re: John Nash on TV, stephen block Mon 29 Apr 2002, 23:24 GMT
    - Re: John Nash on TV, Roger Koppl Tue 30 Apr 2002, 01:41 GMT
      
      Re: John Nash on TV, stephen block Tue 30 Apr 2002, 02:50 GMT
      
      Re: John Nash on TV, stephen block Tue 30 Apr 2002, 02:53 GMT
    - Does capitalism really need growth to survive?, Barry Brooks Tue 30 Apr 2002, 02:19 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]