Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 16:27:38 -0400
To: Colin Danby <danbyc@xxxxxxx>
From: paul davidson <pdavidson@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: taxonomizing heterodoxy -- request for references
Cc: pkt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
At 05:37 PM 4/23/02 , you wrote:
For a short paper aimed at persuading economic anthropologists to take
heterodox econ paradigms more seriously, I want to reference the best
accessible literature taxonomizing schools of thought. Taxonomies would
include, ideally, Institutionalist and Austrian schools as well as PK.
(Economic Anthro tends to divide "economics" into just neoclassical and
Marxian.) Suggestions?
Thanks, Colin
I originally did this in my MONEY AND THE REAL WORLD, ch. 1 and updates in
my 1980 article in PUBLIC INTEREST entitled "Post Keynesian Economics:
Solving The Crisis in Economic Theory" reprinted in MONEY AND EMPLOYMNET,
THE COLLECTED WRITINGS OF PAUL DAVIDSON, vol. 1, edited by Louise Davidson.
The taxonomic table classifies schools of thought bt (1) Politics, and
their views on (2) money, (3) the Wage rate and income distribution, (4)
capital theory, (5) Employment theory, and (6) inflation