PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Lewis Lapham on Davos in NYC
CHRISTIANITY, NATIONALISM, COLONIALISM,
SOCIALISM, FREE-TRADE FUNDAMENTALISM
The above deep belief systems are relevant to
Lewis Lapham's insightful review of Davos in NYC.
His essay begins on page 7 of April 2002 issue of
Harpers, where Lapham is the top editor.
His title is "Leviathan", harking back to Thomas
Hobbes book of the same name. Hobbes saw
the state (and political economy) as a machine
assembled by man. There is today a global rule,
not unlike a state as defined by Hobbes, which
Lapham fears inherits the freedom of the state to
destroy lives and all around it--including itself.
His bottom line: (quoting George Soros), "The
global economy is inherently unstable, dependent
on what people wish for, not what they have in
hand, and is therefore impossible to maintain in
in a state of equilibrium:
left to its own devices, it doesn't know
how to do anything else but destroy itself."
Butressing the bottom line, in his own words,
Lapham says:
"[Attending conferees, (of the CEO turn
of mind,)] accustomed to believing themselves
masters, not the servants, of the brute mechanism
that generates the wealth of nations, assumed that
the mechanism could be invested with Christian
scruples and trained to walk on a leash; it did not
occur to them that it (their beloved free market)
was as mindless as a ball bearing, bereft of the
capacity for human speech or conscious thought.
"Confronted with a thing instead of a man, the
Americans were as helpless as the Europeans
when brought before the thrones of judgement
bound only by the mechanics of profit and loss."
Well there we have it. VOW is up against a
brute mechanism, a self destructive purpose, a
prisoner of its own myopic view of profit and
loss, with no conscience, vision or values.
Perhaps it is nothing new. We the European
race, have been victims of unquestioned belief in
the instituions that grew among men who claimed
Christianity, nationalism, colonialist capitalism,
socialism, and now global free tradism, as their
inspiration. Virtually all Asians have joined us,
although their past varies from our own.
And we are confronted, not by our own better
natures, but by envious Islamic fanatics with too
much oil and not enough freedom.
I strongly recommend Lapham's full essay.
He would clearly endorse a victory over want
but might wonder if anything today suggests it's
in the cards.
He notes the commercial profits that have
flown from 9-11, in Super Bowl ads and
the weapons trade. But the import of his
thought is that these profits will not seek to
finance investment to conquer want or even
terrorism. They will run into the wide river
meandering toward self-destruction.
Now that Davos has left New York, and
its shadow is gone from Puerto Alegre, we here
on the web at VOW have time to take stock of
our mission and our method.
How often to we go to our website? How
much use do we make of its content? Is a
conference as big Davos or Puerrto Alegre the
thing we most admire?
Davos, of course, was the tip of an
iceberg of billions of dollars.The charitable
work of the berg competes daily with its
mindless competitive actions to dominate
an industry or subvert another nation.
On balance, Davos is tied to the decisions
of George Bush until his dicisions solve
an intractable problem--or make it worse.
Puerto Alegre is the multi-cause home
for every aggrieved segment of society.
It is where people like us cry foul-- in a
hall so full of cries none can heard to lead
a campaign to put mindless profit and loss
to work on behalf of VOW and VOH
(victory over hate).
Over the long struggle ahead, to last for
a thousand years, I see the internet today,
and a semantic net tomorrow, as places
to pioneer the VOW agenda.
Why go to Switzerland or Brazil when
our cell phones will soon put us at a table
where we can see everyone whose talking,
preserve what's being said, and interact,
ourselves, with any and every phrase that
sounds off-key in our head?
- Thread context:
- Another Hayect List rejected post,
Henry C.K. Liu Tue 19 Mar 2002, 14:50 GMT
- Rejected Hayek List post,
Henry C.K. Liu Tue 19 Mar 2002, 14:48 GMT
- Re: Call for papers: Joan Robinson Centenary,
LP Rochon Mon 18 Mar 2002, 15:39 GMT
- [Fwd: Asia Times Online],
Henry C.K. Liu Mon 18 Mar 2002, 14:55 GMT
- Lewis Lapham on Davos in NYC,
John Gelles Sun 17 Mar 2002, 21:50 GMT
- Money: Does the US Have Enough? Do You?,
John Gelles Wed 13 Mar 2002, 14:56 GMT
- Re: James Tobin,
Clifford Poirot Wed 13 Mar 2002, 14:28 GMT
- What Is Economics?,
Gunnar Tomasson Wed 13 Mar 2002, 13:58 GMT
- Assistance Please,
John Marangos Wed 13 Mar 2002, 06:26 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]