PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
I=I(r)
On Fri, 25 Jan 2002 21:41:43 +0100 (CET), srl
<larson@xxxxxx> wrote:
>I agree that investment should be high, but this has nothing to do
>with interest rates. There is no scientific study anywhere - and
>I've looked for a while now - that proves ANY kind of correlation
>between investments and interest rates. The I=I(r) is one of the most
>persistent macroeconomic myths in our world. The correct one is of
>course I=I(AD), with appropriate periodicity in denotations.
Keynes GT argument was I=I(E[AD],i), of course. But if policy
is engaged in i=f(Y) when Y=f(Y,I) you do have an awful mess
in sorting out causal relationships from statistical aggregates.
Are there scientific studies such as case studies on investment
decisions within firms that permit a direct look at the causal
relationship without requiring us to read statistical tea leaves
in a maelstrom of intercorrelations?
Virtually,
Bruce McFarling, Shortland, NSW
ecbm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread context:
- The coming deficit,
John Gelles Mon 28 Jan 2002, 04:00 GMT
- Re: [gang8] The perils of internet,
William B. Ryan Mon 28 Jan 2002, 02:42 GMT
- Ethics and Bad Cosmetics,
Henry C.K. Liu Sun 27 Jan 2002, 23:24 GMT
- predicting irrationality,
Ian Murray Sun 27 Jan 2002, 06:54 GMT
- I=I(r),
Bruce McFarling Sun 27 Jan 2002, 02:41 GMT
- Public Investment to Promote the General Welfare,
John Gelles Fri 25 Jan 2002, 19:21 GMT
- James Galbraith on Enron,
Ian Murray Fri 25 Jan 2002, 17:58 GMT
- WORKSHOP - WEHIA 2002,
Antonio PALESTRINI Fri 25 Jan 2002, 17:33 GMT
- What if and Why of Zero Taxation,
John Gelles Fri 25 Jan 2002, 14:03 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]