PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: What if and Why of Zero Taxation
The problem of substituting either borrowing or forced
saving for taxes is that elimination of taxes removes the
source of value from a fiat currency. All these schemes
address is affecting the amount of value once the status of
valuable has been established.
Before discussing the amount of value a currency has one
must first ascertain the currency has value.
John Gelles wrote:
>
> Berglund, Hummel and Winslow almost reached
> the "why" of this subject on the 'Korean War two
> currency' thread.
>
> -- If no taxes were collected than government
> spending would either keep adding new money
> to the economy or government would have to
> borrow old money from firms and individuals
> to match its spending the way taxes can. --
>
> Paraphrase of Per Berglund
>
> -- Zero tax revenues would require that the
> Treasury finance its spending by borrowing
> from the public or from the central bank. --
>
> Paraphrase of William Hummel
>
> The above mention of "what if" does not make
> explicit another form of borrowing that would
> allow the Treasury to spend budgeted money
> without balancing it to budgeted tax revenues.
>
> Such form of borrowing could be public savings
> deposited with the Treasury.
>
> Now to the "Why": IF instead of paying taxes,
> taxpayers only saved the same amounts, the
> taxpayers would feel comfortable. Saving in
> lieu of taxes would be seen as protecting the
> value of money -- not taking the shirt off a
> taxpayer's back.
>
> When the time came for taxpayers to spend
> some of these savings, the economy would
> have to have grown in the output of things to
> buy sufficiently for such spending to have
> no effect on price.
>
> This appraoch to zero taxation highlights the
> main purpose of taxes as a tool to prevent
> hyperinflation. Savings deposited with the
> treasury do the same thing.
>
> If we would avoid deflation and recession,
> we should also avoid taxes.
>
> If we would avoid high inflation and hyper-
> inflation, the use of such special savings in
> place of taxes will have to be well managed--
> there may be times when spending of such
> savings would have to be temporarily
> controlled.
--
-- jbod
Tax Privilege, Not People
___________________________________________________
Come visit and see a new economic perspective --
http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/1067
Comments/arguments welcome.
.
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]