"I have never received a reply giving a logical reason why this could not or should not be done."
________________
The present tax system is voluntary to the extent that tax obligations are self-assessed and remitted. We can under assess and we can fail to remit. Enforcement is sporadic.
Typically new taxes, and what you propose is a new tax, do not replace but augment existing taxes. Undoubtedly, what you propose would increase the effective rate of taxation.
If the fundamental problem is a falling demand curve relative to the costs of production, the automatic "debiting" of transactional accounts could not fail to have the effect of reducing demand still further, exacerbating the problem.
Transactional accounts should probably be credited by the government not debited.
Look at Argentina. For the past four years and especially the past year they have suffered a massive contraction of their money supply. The fractional reserves in their banking system are not in pesos but dollars on deposit at the New York Fed. As each dollar leaves in foreign debt service or capital flight, more than a dollar in equivalent pesos is extracted from Argentina's domestic economy. During 2001 Argentina lost half of its dollar reserves.
In principle, they could have stabilized the situation without default on foreign debt. This could have been accomplished by "de-linking" their reserves from the dollar. As each dollar is extracted from Argentina in debt service or capital flight, a corresponding peso would be "credited" to transactional accounts, immediately augmenting demand in their domestic economy while at the same time preserving the reserve basis of their fractional reserve system.*
But what they have done is nail the final nail into the coffin of an already collapsed economy. They have defaulted on foreign debt, thereby closing off international aid and cooperation. And they have put severe restrictions on withdrawals from transactional accounts.
*Such a program must be accompanied in the long term by reasonable protection for local industry and checks against capital flight. Otherwise, dollar reserves at some point will become totally depleted. This is possible for a continental nation like Argentina which can produce most of what it consumes.
Argentina will still need to import some things and for that reason must export some things. For that we might look at the method utilized by the old Soviet Union which was essentially barter. The Soviet method avoided foreign trade and current account imbalences. In Argentina's case it would be a free enterprise market economy domestically dealing through barter internationally.
- Re: NYTimes on Skidelsky's Keynes, (continued)
- Re: NYTimes on Skidelsky's Keynes, Henry C.K. Liu Tue 22 Jan 2002, 22:00 GMT
- Re: NYTimes on Skidelsky's Keynes, Mongiovi Gary Tue 22 Jan 2002, 20:50 GMT
- Chartalism and Hyperinflation, Henry C.K. Liu Sun 20 Jan 2002, 23:09 GMT
- test, Lee, Frederic Thu 17 Jan 2002, 19:27 GMT
- Don't Cry for me "ArgentinO", William B. Ryan Thu 17 Jan 2002, 15:50 GMT
- floating exchange rate, Henry C.K. Liu Thu 17 Jan 2002, 07:36 GMT
- Re: floating exchange rate, phillp2 Thu 17 Jan 2002, 16:48 GMT
- Re: floating exchange rate, William F Hummel Thu 17 Jan 2002, 18:19 GMT
- Re: floating exchange rate, J. Barkley Rosser, Jr. Thu 17 Jan 2002, 20:36 GMT