PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Case solved, at last!
On Tue, 11 Dec 2001 11:33:13 -0500, Gunnar Tómasson
<gunnar.tomasson@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Re. the following:
>> See: anachronistic introduction of the core neoclassical
>> concept into classical economic theory and the General
>> Theory.
>Comment:
>What is your non-anachronistic construction of Say's Law?
Uhhh ... you are joking, aren't you? Or you really cannot
see what in the following is the anachronistic projection
from post-1870's neoclassical thought into pre-1870's
classical thought?
> >In fact, there is nothing mysterious about Say's Law - it
> >restates in terms of Supply in the Factor Market and Demand
> >in the Market for Final Ouput the logical implications of
> >the maximizing attributes of Homo Economicus which underlies
> >all of Economic Science.
Virtually,
Bruce McFarling, Shortland, NSW
ecbm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread context:
- Besomi's Harrod Page,
Steve Keen Fri 14 Dec 2001, 08:36 GMT
- Predicting the Unprecedented,
John Gelles Fri 14 Dec 2001, 02:03 GMT
- Fw: DCDNS3(Michale Sonis),
J. Barkley Rosser, Jr. Thu 13 Dec 2001, 19:41 GMT
- Re: Kurland-Lane dialog (2),
William B. Ryan Thu 13 Dec 2001, 15:59 GMT
- Re: Case solved, at last!,
Bruce McFarling Thu 13 Dec 2001, 07:43 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]