Is it a safe assumption that all thinkers on the subject of full employment have in mind that "full employment" is relative to the labor pool and that the labor pool is international?
National measurements of unemployment are based on an assumption of a zero exclusive of the standing army of unemployed waiting at the borders of all developed nations.
What are the implications of this for the ELR/JG proposals? In particular, will absolute immigration control be necessary? If so, is this realistic? Can all nations be Japan? Can Japan be Japan?
Dear Mason
every nation has unfulfilled community needs every nation has excess labour not wanted by the capitalist sector every nation can issue its own fiat currency every nation therefore can have a JG. adjustments then have to be made to trade patterns. the head-office capitalist nations would have to obey the market dictates that would follow. or they go broke. market logic would force that.
best wishes bill
William F. Mitchell Professor of Economics and Head of Department Director, Centre of Full Employment and Equity University of Newcastle New South Wales, Australia E-mail: ecwfm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Phone: +61-2-4921 5065 Fax: +61-2-4921 6919 Mobile: 0419 422 410
WWW Home Page: http://e1.newcastle.edu.au/economics/bill/billeco.html
- Re: Full Employment is what?, (continued)
- Re: Full Employment is what?, Warren Mosler Tue 29 May 2001, 16:40 GMT
- Re: Full Employment is what?, paul davidson Tue 29 May 2001, 18:38 GMT
- Re: Full Employment is what?, Mason Clark Tue 29 May 2001, 19:25 GMT
- Re: Full Employment is what?, Paul Davidson Tue 29 May 2001, 23:57 GMT
- Re: Full Employment is what?, Bill Mitchell Wed 30 May 2001, 20:32 GMT
- Message not available
- Re: Full Employment is what?, Paul Davidson Wed 30 May 2001, 01:09 GMT
- Re: Full Employment is what?, Sven R Larson Wed 30 May 2001, 15:12 GMT
- Re: Full Employment is what?, Bill Mitchell Wed 30 May 2001, 20:29 GMT
- Re: Full Employment is what?, Sven R Larson Tue 29 May 2001, 07:30 GMT