PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Full Employment is what?
At 03:40 PM 5/27/01 -0400, you wrote:
Surely we can define full employment without
recourse to such a dubious
concept as "marginal utility" (or disutility).
surely not! Unless one wants to be arbitrary and appeal to some
arbitrary empirical rate of unemployment-- but what rate would that
be?
After all the unemployment rate is based on a small sample--- so that 2
standard deviation (at least it was at one time) 0.2. Surely an
unemployment rate of 0.00 is more than full employment.
During the second world war the unemployment rate got down as low as 1.9
per cent.
Now some people thought that when the economy got to 4.1%
unemployment last year we were at full employment. What do you
think?
How about defining full employment as when a disgusted worker can spit in
the employer's eye and walk across the street and get as god a job?
Is that related to the MARGINAL DISUTILITY of working for the first
employer??
Warren Mosler's ELR would offer to employ all who were willing to work at
a government wage rate BELOW the market wage rate as full
employment?
But if one asks what would happen if the private sector syphoned off all
the skilled workers from the government ELR labor force and still had the
expectation of making more profits if they expanded further. If
some private sector employers raised the market wage rate relative
to the government wage (a sort of wage inflation) in order to
pirate workers from other private sector entrepreneurs -- would
that mean that we were at more than full employment with ELR?
At least the Mosler ELR concept has as definition of full employment that
has some meaning -- but the problem is that thre government wage
rate MUST be significantly lower than the private sector wage rate.
Thus there may be many workers who would be willing to work at the market
wage rate but who could not find a job -- and still not be willing to
work at the government wage rate? Is that what we mean by full
employment??
Paul
Paul
Paul Davidson
Editor, JOURNAL OF POST KEYNESIAN ECONOMICS
Holly Chair of Excellence in Political Economy
Economics Department - University of Tennessee
523 SMC
Knoxville, Tennessee 37996-0550
work phone: (865) 974-4221
fax: (865) 974-4601/ (865) 974-1686
home phone and fax: (865) 692-0802
- Thread context:
- Caldwell: Why Hayek Didn't Review the GT,
Alan G. Isaac Thu 31 May 2001, 18:34 GMT
- Jobs, Pay, Prices, Green, Peace,
John Gelles Thu 31 May 2001, 10:35 GMT
- Re: Circular Flow and The Multiplier,
Gunnar Tomasson Wed 30 May 2001, 12:14 GMT
- Minimizing consumption,
Barry Brooks Mon 28 May 2001, 23:56 GMT
- Re: Full Employment is what?,
Paul Davidson Mon 28 May 2001, 00:05 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]