|
John,
I agree, the assumption that firms have perfect information cannot be reconciled with an uncertain future. My reference to Say's Law was just that if you can expect to sell (supply) whatever you want, it is a small step to saying supply creates its own demand. I agree that the perfect competition model is not a very useful depiction of reality and that competition, even between small firms, looks different. Issues like rivalry etc play a role. What I wanted to show is that even if one accepts some notion of flat demand curves, it does not invalidate the macro argument of Keynes. In a system where effective demand determines output it still will be the industry demand curve that limits output. Philippe |
- Fwd: Re: Keynes and competition, (continued)
- Fwd: Re: Keynes and competition, paul davidson Tue 22 May 2001, 14:04 GMT
- Re: Fwd: Re: Keynes and competition, Harry Veeder Wed 23 May 2001, 02:28 GMT
- Message not available
- Notions of the labour supply., Harry Veeder Thu 24 May 2001, 20:50 GMT
- Fwd: Re: Keynes and competition, paul davidson Tue 22 May 2001, 14:06 GMT
- Re: Keynes and competition, PHILIPPE BURGER Tue 22 May 2001, 19:28 GMT
- Re: Keynes and competition, PHILIPPE BURGER Tue 22 May 2001, 19:36 GMT
- Re: Keynes and competition, Kazuhiro Kurose Wed 23 May 2001, 04:50 GMT
- Re: Keynes and competition, Bruce McFarling Wed 23 May 2001, 05:12 GMT
- Re: Keynes and competition, John O'Donnell Fri 25 May 2001, 06:25 GMT