Dear Kazuhiro,
From my perspective, this question is irrelevant since the model of perfect competition itself is unsound. I have recently completed a presentation on this topic, which I have placed on my Debunking Economics website (www.debunking-economics.com); choose the menu items "Maths" and then "Presentation" if you'd like to check it out.
I'm presenting it this week to a seminar at my department; it should be a lively experience (which I hope to live through!). The material there owes a lot to both John Legge and Geoff Fishburn on this list.
Cheers, Steve At 04:46 PM 5/21/01 Monday, you wrote:
To: <pkt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Keynes and competition
Davidson has been insisting that the existence of involuntary unemployment has nothing to do with the assumption whether the economy is the perfect competition or the imperfect one. This means that the principle of effective demand is still valid even if we are in the perfect competition world. However, those, whom I should call the new Keyensian such as Clower or T. Negishi, emphasized the importance of the imperfect competition. According to them, the perfect competition means that the individual (not aggregate) demand curve is flat, and then the capitalists expect that they could sell the goods whatever they want. But there are no demand constraints in this circumstance. Therefore, they thought that there is disequilibrium in the goods market at Keynes' system, and it is plausible for them to assume the imperfect competition.
What would you think about the new Keynesian thought like this? I think that the judgment on whether Keynes' system is perfect competition or imperfect one depends upon the judgment on whether there is disequilibrium in goods market or not. It is obvious that the new Keynesian thought that there is disequilibrium in goods market. What do you think about this opinion?
************************************** Kazuhiro Kurose Graduate School of Economics and Business Administration, Hokkaido University Kita 9 Nishi 7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Japan 060-0809 TEL: +81-11-716-2111 ex:2786 **************************************
Home Page: http://bus.uws.edu.au/steve-keen/ http://www.debunking-economics.com http://www.stevekeen.net Dr. Steve Keen Senior Lecturer Economics & Finance Campbelltown, Building 11 Room 30, School of Economics and Finance UNIVERSITY WESTERN SYDNEY LOCKED BAG 1797 PENRITH SOUTH DC NSW 1797 Australia s.keen@xxxxxxxxxx 61 2 4620-3016 Fax 61 2 4626-6683 Home 02 9558-8018 Mobile 0409 716 088
- Re: Keynes and competition, (continued)
- Re: Keynes and competition, PHILIPPE BURGER Mon 21 May 2001, 15:50 GMT
- Re: Keynes and competition, John M. Legge Mon 21 May 2001, 23:53 GMT
- Re: Keynes and competition, Kazuhiro Kurose Tue 22 May 2001, 05:11 GMT
- Re: Keynes and competition, David MacInnes Wed 23 May 2001, 00:34 GMT
- Re: Keynes and competition, Steve Keen Mon 21 May 2001, 23:23 GMT
- Re: Keynes and competition, Bruce McFarling Tue 22 May 2001, 04:45 GMT
- Re: Keynes and competition, Harry Veeder Tue 22 May 2001, 21:21 GMT
- Re: Keynes and competition, Kazuhiro Kurose Wed 23 May 2001, 04:29 GMT
- Fwd: Re: Keynes and competition, paul davidson Tue 22 May 2001, 14:04 GMT