Bill, I agree with your general point. During the last US census, conservative Republicans were discouraging full census responses citing privacy concerns, but it seemed to be an effort to reduce the documentation of poverty related measures. However on this specific (claiming a Jedi religion), I have to side with the rebels. Alan
Dear Alan
Perhaps the religious issue doesn't appear in any regressions! But in Australia, there is a major shift in public spending away from public (secular) schools towards private schools (which include a range of religious schools) based on pure ideological preference of the conservative government. The claim is that this is just reflecting the preferences of the population towards a more diverse education (including religious diversity) and is a good thing, despite there being little evidence provided about the proportions. So I can see this as a potential smokescreen to be used by conservatives to obfuscate the issue - just how many people are in these supposed "chosen" religions that deserve public money? They will say the figures are misleading b/c of these rebels.
all the best bill
- Global Keynesianism (by James Paul, UN), g kohler Fri 18 May 2001, 02:06 GMT
- religion and the state down under, Alan G. Isaac Wed 16 May 2001, 03:41 GMT
- Re: religion and the state down under, Bill Mitchell Wed 16 May 2001, 21:17 GMT
- Re: religion and the state down under, Alan G. Isaac Thu 17 May 2001, 13:57 GMT
- Re: religion and the state down under, Bill Mitchell Thu 17 May 2001, 20:22 GMT
- Re: religion and the state down under, Alan G. Isaac Fri 18 May 2001, 15:12 GMT
- Henry Kissinger Liu Looks at Taiwan and Cuba, John Gelles Tue 15 May 2001, 21:09 GMT
- IMF + FOMC = ?, Canova, Timothy Tue 15 May 2001, 00:43 GMT
- Re: IMF + FOMC = ?, Basil Moore Tue 15 May 2001, 06:21 GMT