PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
``globalization'' and poverty
I figure too many on pkt would never forgive
themselves for missing this NYT editorial . . .
Alan Isaac
-----------------------------------------------------------------
NYT
April 24, 2001
Protesting for Whom?
By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN
CCRA, Ghana --- I thought about going to the Quebec
Summit of the Americas, but I lost my gas mask so
I decided to go to Africa instead. It's
interesting listening to Africans talk about
globalization. While the protesters in Quebec were
busy denouncing globalization in the name of
Africans and the world's poor, Africans themselves
will tell you that their problem with
globalization is not that they are getting too
much of it, but too little.
That's not surprising, because if you actually
look around Africa you see that the countries
that are the most democratic, where the people
have the most freedom to choose --- South Africa,
Nigeria, Ghana --- are the most pro-trade, the most
integrated in the world economy and the most
globalized. The countries that are led by
dictators, are the least open and where the
people have the least freedom to choose --- Sudan,
Zimbabwe, Liberia, Libya etc. --- are those most
hostile to globalization, openness and trade in
goods and services.
So if you were wondering why you saw so few
Africans joining the anti- globalization
"festival" in Quebec, it's because they
understand that --- with the exception of the
environmentalists --- this anti-globalization
movement is largely the well intentioned but ill
informed being led around by the ill intentioned
and well informed (protectionist unions and
anarchists), who do not serve Africa's interests.
Last year this same anti-globalization gang, in
its most shameful hour, tried to block
Congressional passage of the African Growth and
Opportunity Act --- a bill enabling Africa's
poorest countries to export textiles to the U.S.
with little or no tariffs, which is critical for
creating lots of low-skilled jobs. Eventually the
bill squeaked through. The early result?
Madagascar's textile exports to the U.S. are up
120 percent, Malawi's are up 1,000 percent,
Nigeria's are up 1,000 percent and South Africa's
are up 47 percent. Real jobs for real people.
Ghana, like so many African countries, has
largely lived off aid and the export of raw
materials. But for the first time it is
developing an information sector to do data
processing for American Express and Aetna, which
is providing jobs that pay much higher than
average Ghanaian salaries. "People here want into
the global marketplace; they know it's the only
way out of poverty," says George Apenteng,
director of Ghana's Institute for Economic
Affairs. "But people here are also worried they
won't be able to compete and that [Western]
markets aren't as open to what we can sell, like
agriculture, as ours are to what they sell."
Which is why Jagdish Bhagwati, the Indian-born
Columbia University trade economist, insists
that: "The civil society groups who are concerned
about the poor should actually be working to
extend the benefits of globalization and freer
trade to the truly poor in Africa, not denying
them these opportunities. Simultaneously, they
should be working for adjustment assistance and
retraining for our workers, so they are not
abandoned to the unregulated forces of
international competition."
Face it, says Jeff Sachs, the Harvard development
economist. Africans today are literally dying of
poverty --- not simply AIDS, but diseases that
could easily be eradicated but aren't because
there is so little economic growth Africans don't
have the resources. Mr. Sachs notes that one of
the main reasons Africa has fallen so far behind
East Asia, Mexico or Brazil is because it has
been stuck just exporting raw materials, and has
failed to create the legal and tax incentives to
attract the global investment and factories that
would create sustainable, diversified jobs.
Africa's only hope is that through globalization
its coastal cities might one day become the sort
of export platforms, tourism and service centers
that China's are today. "There is not a single
example in modern history of a country
successfully developing without trading and
integrating with the global economy," says Mr.
Sachs.
The fact is, virtually all the leaders who met in
Quebec to expand trade were democratically
elected, while "the people" in the streets
clamoring for "justice" were self-appointed or
paid union activists. There is nothing romantic
about them. By inhibiting global trade expansion
they are choking the only route out of poverty
for the world's poor. Which is why these
"protesters" should be called by their real name:
The Coalition to Keep Poor People Poor.
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]