|
Earlier today, I congratulated Geoffrey Gardiner on his
"brilliant synopsis of Creditary Economics" on the PKT list.
The prompt dismissive comments by Harry Veeder
and John O'Donnell suggest that they are an exception to the rule whereof Keynes
once wrote as follows:
"If only Malthus, instead of Ricardo, had been
the parent stem from which nineteenth-century economics proceeded, what a much
wiser and richer place the world would be to-day! We have laboriously
to re-discover and force through the obscuring envelopes of our misguided
education what should never have ceased to be obvious."
In economics, of course, the "obvious" is only
so retrospectively - or, in O'Donnell's sagacious phrase, Much Ado About
Nothing.
Gunnar
|
- Re: Palestinian Economic Proposal, (continued)
- Re: Palestinian Economic Proposal, Sven R Larson Wed 18 Apr 2001, 08:54 GMT
- Re: Palestinian Economic Proposal, Warren Mosler Wed 18 Apr 2001, 15:04 GMT
- The Mosler Plan - a comment, Sven R Larson Mon 23 Apr 2001, 11:43 GMT
- editorial announcement, J. Barkley Rosser, Jr. Wed 11 Apr 2001, 21:08 GMT
- Re. Creditary Economics, Gunnar Tomasson Wed 11 Apr 2001, 18:09 GMT
- Re: Re. Creditary Economics, Harry Veeder Thu 12 Apr 2001, 20:24 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Re. Creditary Economics, Harry Veeder Thu 12 Apr 2001, 20:29 GMT
- Creitary economics, GGard97342 Wed 11 Apr 2001, 10:54 GMT
- Re: Creitary economics, John O'Donnell Wed 11 Apr 2001, 16:46 GMT