PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Gang of 21 Growing and Going
The gang8 (21 strong) looks at lower stock prices, a large
trade deficit, a mighty dollar (able to drift down as yen
and euo dirft up -- or NOT), financial derivatives moving
across national borders in a giant game of craps, big debt,
possible inflation and deflation, etc., and wonders when
the U.S. authorities in Congress, the central bank and
executive branch will face a business depression and
watch transfixed as it raisees unemployment and lowers
living standards on Main Street. They study 1930 but
not 1941.
Of particular interest to the gang8 list is articulation of
a foundation for a money system able to prevent the
the events that promt the question, "Where do we go
from the here and now (with the deflation, debt and
deficit, etc., above) -- if we want to end up rich,
green and at peace in a better 'new economy' world."
The gang knows that money, credit, liquidity, debt,
etc., is less than half the story -- the "real" economy of
logistically significant supplies (of food, energy, tools,
necessities, weapons, etc., ) cannot be bought in
markets -- until it is produced where a money rich
nation can buy and benefit from it -- can use it
systematically to sustain its "real" wealth and power
to do good for all.
So I like to approach the gang's love of foundational
argument with the following:
"The logical syntax of language is science"
-- Rudolph Carnap circa 1930.
"Money is a language:
The logical foundation of money is logistics."
-- John Gelles circa now.
If there were no time (and all trade were done on
an instant exchange basis,) there would be no need
of money.
If there were no change of stuff over time, and all
barter could be forseen with respect to the future
delivery of exchanged specific stuff, there would also
be not need of money: promised specific deliveries
would be sufficient.
Money, then, represents future "general" delivery of
"non-specific stuff" of measured value in relation to
an original bargain.
Since one can bargain an exchange of anything
for anything else, the money supply (in a perfect
system -- that never ran short of money -- and
never had too much in banks and matresses) would
measure the "real" wealth of the world in "units
of money" (whether or not tangible currency and
recorded bank credits) added up to the same
total as the potential wealth exchanges.
In fact, we can be sure they will not.
So how much money can lenders lend and
governments (and others) spend? As much
as they want.
The only effect will be changes in price
of actual stuff, actually bought and sold.
Can price deflation ever again present a real
problem? Of course not. Not IF government
spends enough. Spending by governments
(or anyone with lots of money) ends deflation.
Can price inflation present a real problem?
Of course it can! Inflation can destroy a money
based economy and force people back to barter
-- and all the inefficiencies that threatens.
Are computerized barter systems compatible with
innovative free enterprise? Yes. But they will
take a lot of time and talent to develop. Living
standards may not be sustainable IF money fails
to motivate mental and physical work.
Can we avoid extreme inflation in peacetime the
way it's done in war? Yes we can. And we will
if it comes to that. 1941, not 1930, rules.
So the gang8 is worrying over something that
will never happen. Inflation will be contained
by supply, saving, and taxes. The harder part
today is taxes -- and we've already got that
system in place. Systems development for
better supply and savings are on their way.
All of which is not to minimize the threat of
mad cow disease, aids, nuclear proliferation,
terrorists, murderers or busted school systems.
John Gelles www.1944.org
----- Original Message -----
From: Gunnar Tomasson <tomasson@xxxxxxxx>
To: POST KEYNESIAN THOUGHT <pkt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2000 5:32 AM
Subject: Fw: Where Do We Go From Here?
The following Gang8 exchanges may be of interest to PKTers.
Gunnar
[ see Original Message for more ]
- Thread context:
- Re: query, (continued)
- Re: query,
Per Gunnar Berglund Thu 28 Dec 2000, 23:12 GMT
- Re: query,
Matias Vernengo Thu 28 Dec 2000, 23:13 GMT
- Re:,
J. Barkley Rosser, Jr. Thu 28 Dec 2000, 15:52 GMT
- Fw: Where Do We Go From Here?,
Gunnar Tomasson Wed 27 Dec 2000, 17:07 GMT
- [Fwd: Fwd: Re: Tax Cut And Budget Surplus],
Henry C.K. Liu Wed 27 Dec 2000, 01:31 GMT
- The big "R" and "An interesting quote", ... no?,
Ed Goertzen Tue 26 Dec 2000, 16:08 GMT
- war on poverty,
Alan G. Isaac Tue 26 Dec 2000, 16:06 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]