|
Recent exchanges on uncertainty, probability etc. raise an important
question:
What does probability have to do with theoretical economics?
While Einstein may have been in a minority of one among his peers in
suggesting that the probability calculus and associated non-deterministic view
of quantum mechanical phenomena was predicated on ignorance with respect
to the behavior of non-probabilistic individual "systems" as distinct
from ensembles thereof, there was never any question that, in the context
of quantum mechanics, use of the probability calculus yielded predictions whose
accuracy was unsurpassed.
Considering that use of the probability calculus in quantum mechanics is
sanctioned by predictive accuracy, what would justify its use in would-be
economic models of - by QM standards - risible predictive accuracy?
Gunnar
|
- Re: Containing the Collapse, (continued)
- Re: Containing the Collapse, John Gelles Wed 27 Dec 2000, 15:11 GMT
- set pkt nomail eo200@ncf.ca, Harry Veeder Sun 24 Dec 2000, 01:27 GMT
- Further Thoughts on Interest Rates and Inflation, Henry C.K. Liu Sun 24 Dec 2000, 01:27 GMT
- Unemployment Conference in Newcastle, NSW, June 2001, Martin Watts Sat 23 Dec 2000, 01:34 GMT
- Probability And Economics, Gunnar Tomasson Sat 23 Dec 2000, 01:33 GMT
- Re: Probability And Economics, Shalom Patrick Hamou Tue 26 Dec 2000, 16:08 GMT
- Foreign Investment in USA, Moreno Villanueva Sat 23 Dec 2000, 01:33 GMT
- Keynes in the news, Jim Devine Fri 22 Dec 2000, 19:54 GMT
- Re: Keynes in the news, Steven A. Waller Sun 24 Dec 2000, 01:29 GMT