PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
RE: Uncertainty
On Thu, 21 Dec 2000, John M. Legge wrote:
> For rhetorical purposes at least Schumpeter puts it better: future
> preferences change, not because of human irrationality, but because of
> innovation.
This just reflect a twisted (or at least for these
purposes, useless) notion of preferences.
> It is hard to imagine even Lucas saying with a straight face that people
> have an ordered set of preferences between the types of power plant on offer
> in cars in 2020.
Yet that remains the standard neoclassical formulation.
Odd but true.
Alan Isaac
- Thread context:
- RE: uncertainty, (continued)
- RE: uncertainty,
Forstater, Mathew Tue 19 Dec 2000, 20:20 GMT
- Re: uncertainty,
J. Barkley Rosser, Jr. Wed 20 Dec 2000, 00:56 GMT
- Re: Uncertainty,
PHILIPPE BURGER Wed 20 Dec 2000, 16:11 GMT
- RE: Uncertainty,
Forstater, Mathew Thu 21 Dec 2000, 15:38 GMT
- Re: Uncertainty,
J. Barkley Rosser, Jr. Thu 21 Dec 2000, 21:05 GMT
- Turkey - the latest IMF victim,
Henry C.K. Liu Wed 13 Dec 2000, 15:43 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]